Cargando…

Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were consider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García de León, David, Vahter, Tanel, Zobel, Martin, Koppel, Mati, Edesi, Liina, Davison, John, Al-Quraishy, Saleh, Hozzein, Wael N., Moora, Mari, Oja, Jane, Vasar, Martti, Öpik, Maarja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878
_version_ 1783540173538066432
author García de León, David
Vahter, Tanel
Zobel, Martin
Koppel, Mati
Edesi, Liina
Davison, John
Al-Quraishy, Saleh
Hozzein, Wael N.
Moora, Mari
Oja, Jane
Vasar, Martti
Öpik, Maarja
author_facet García de León, David
Vahter, Tanel
Zobel, Martin
Koppel, Mati
Edesi, Liina
Davison, John
Al-Quraishy, Saleh
Hozzein, Wael N.
Moora, Mari
Oja, Jane
Vasar, Martti
Öpik, Maarja
author_sort García de León, David
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7259642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72596422020-06-08 Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms García de León, David Vahter, Tanel Zobel, Martin Koppel, Mati Edesi, Liina Davison, John Al-Quraishy, Saleh Hozzein, Wael N. Moora, Mari Oja, Jane Vasar, Martti Öpik, Maarja PLoS One Research Article The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259642/ /pubmed/32470094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878 Text en © 2020 García de León et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
García de León, David
Vahter, Tanel
Zobel, Martin
Koppel, Mati
Edesi, Liina
Davison, John
Al-Quraishy, Saleh
Hozzein, Wael N.
Moora, Mari
Oja, Jane
Vasar, Martti
Öpik, Maarja
Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title_full Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title_fullStr Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title_full_unstemmed Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title_short Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
title_sort different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878
work_keys_str_mv AT garciadeleondavid differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT vahtertanel differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT zobelmartin differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT koppelmati differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT edesiliina differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT davisonjohn differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT alquraishysaleh differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT hozzeinwaeln differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT mooramari differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT ojajane differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT vasarmartti differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms
AT opikmaarja differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms