Cargando…
Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were consider...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878 |
_version_ | 1783540173538066432 |
---|---|
author | García de León, David Vahter, Tanel Zobel, Martin Koppel, Mati Edesi, Liina Davison, John Al-Quraishy, Saleh Hozzein, Wael N. Moora, Mari Oja, Jane Vasar, Martti Öpik, Maarja |
author_facet | García de León, David Vahter, Tanel Zobel, Martin Koppel, Mati Edesi, Liina Davison, John Al-Quraishy, Saleh Hozzein, Wael N. Moora, Mari Oja, Jane Vasar, Martti Öpik, Maarja |
author_sort | García de León, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7259642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72596422020-06-08 Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms García de León, David Vahter, Tanel Zobel, Martin Koppel, Mati Edesi, Liina Davison, John Al-Quraishy, Saleh Hozzein, Wael N. Moora, Mari Oja, Jane Vasar, Martti Öpik, Maarja PLoS One Research Article The present study aimed to investigate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities originating from organic and conventional agriculture on wheat growth and yield. Six different spring wheat cultivars released in different years in north and central European countries were considered. We hypothesised that AM fungal inoculum collected from organic agricultural fields would elicit a greater positive growth response than inoculum collected from conventional agricultural fields; and that older cultivars, which were developed under conditions of low fertilizer input, would exhibit overall greater growth responses to the presence of AM fungi, compared with more recent cultivars, and that AM fungal inoculum from conventional fields might have the most beneficial effect on the growth and yield of recent cultivars. The results showed that the overall effects on the growth and yield of spring wheat grown with organic and conventional AM fungal inocula did not differ greatly. However, the inoculation growth response, showing the difference of the effects of organic and conventional inocula, varied between particular wheat cultivars. Inoculation growth response of the cultivar Pikker (released in 1959) was the most positive, while that of the cultivar Arabella (released in 2012) was the most negative. The use of AM fungal inoculum from organic fields resulted in slightly taller plant individuals. Pikker showed relatively higher yield and stronger growth when the organic AM fungal inoculum was used. Arabella exhibited relatively lower yield and weaker growth when the organic inoculum was used. Whether the positive response of Pikker to Estonian organic inoculation reflects adaptation to the locally occurring AM fungal community needs to be established by further studies of the communities of AM fungi colonizing wheat roots. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259642/ /pubmed/32470094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878 Text en © 2020 García de León et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article García de León, David Vahter, Tanel Zobel, Martin Koppel, Mati Edesi, Liina Davison, John Al-Quraishy, Saleh Hozzein, Wael N. Moora, Mari Oja, Jane Vasar, Martti Öpik, Maarja Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title | Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title_full | Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title_fullStr | Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title_full_unstemmed | Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title_short | Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
title_sort | different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciadeleondavid differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT vahtertanel differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT zobelmartin differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT koppelmati differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT edesiliina differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT davisonjohn differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT alquraishysaleh differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT hozzeinwaeln differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT mooramari differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT ojajane differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT vasarmartti differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms AT opikmaarja differentwheatcultivarsexhibitvariableresponsestoinoculationwitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungifromorganicandconventionalfarms |