Cargando…
The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999 |
_version_ | 1783540174020411392 |
---|---|
author | Mezes, Magdolna Havu, Roope Tolmacheva, Aleksandra Lioumis, Pantelis Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Shulga, Anastasia |
author_facet | Mezes, Magdolna Havu, Roope Tolmacheva, Aleksandra Lioumis, Pantelis Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Shulga, Anastasia |
author_sort | Mezes, Magdolna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a stable manner in healthy participants and enhances voluntary motor output in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We further investigated the impact of settings of this PAS variant on MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. In experiment 1, we compared 0.2-Hz vs 0.4-Hz PAS. In experiment 2, PNS frequencies of 100 Hz, 200 Hz, and 400 Hz were compared. In experiment 3, we added a second TMS pulse. When compared with 0.4-Hz PAS, 0.2-Hz PAS was significantly more effective after 30 minutes (p = 0.05) and 60 minutes (p = 0.014). MEP potentiation by PAS with 100-Hz and 200-Hz PNS did not differ. PAS with 400-Hz PNS was less effective than 100-Hz (p = 0.023) and 200-Hz (p = 0.013) PNS. Adding an extra TMS pulse rendered PAS strongly inhibitory. These negative findings demonstrate that the 0.2-Hz PAS with 100-Hz PNS previously used in clinical studies is optimal and the modifications employed here do not enhance its efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7259644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72596442020-06-08 The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component Mezes, Magdolna Havu, Roope Tolmacheva, Aleksandra Lioumis, Pantelis Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Shulga, Anastasia PLoS One Research Article Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a stable manner in healthy participants and enhances voluntary motor output in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We further investigated the impact of settings of this PAS variant on MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. In experiment 1, we compared 0.2-Hz vs 0.4-Hz PAS. In experiment 2, PNS frequencies of 100 Hz, 200 Hz, and 400 Hz were compared. In experiment 3, we added a second TMS pulse. When compared with 0.4-Hz PAS, 0.2-Hz PAS was significantly more effective after 30 minutes (p = 0.05) and 60 minutes (p = 0.014). MEP potentiation by PAS with 100-Hz and 200-Hz PNS did not differ. PAS with 400-Hz PNS was less effective than 100-Hz (p = 0.023) and 200-Hz (p = 0.013) PNS. Adding an extra TMS pulse rendered PAS strongly inhibitory. These negative findings demonstrate that the 0.2-Hz PAS with 100-Hz PNS previously used in clinical studies is optimal and the modifications employed here do not enhance its efficacy. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259644/ /pubmed/32470028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999 Text en © 2020 Mezes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mezes, Magdolna Havu, Roope Tolmacheva, Aleksandra Lioumis, Pantelis Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Shulga, Anastasia The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title | The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title_full | The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title_fullStr | The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title_short | The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component |
title_sort | impact of tms and pns frequencies on mep potentiation in pas with high-frequency peripheral component |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mezesmagdolna theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT havuroope theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT tolmachevaaleksandra theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT lioumispantelis theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT makelajyrkip theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT shulgaanastasia theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT mezesmagdolna impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT havuroope impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT tolmachevaaleksandra impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT lioumispantelis impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT makelajyrkip impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent AT shulgaanastasia impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent |