Cargando…

The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mezes, Magdolna, Havu, Roope, Tolmacheva, Aleksandra, Lioumis, Pantelis, Mäkelä, Jyrki P., Shulga, Anastasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999
_version_ 1783540174020411392
author Mezes, Magdolna
Havu, Roope
Tolmacheva, Aleksandra
Lioumis, Pantelis
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Shulga, Anastasia
author_facet Mezes, Magdolna
Havu, Roope
Tolmacheva, Aleksandra
Lioumis, Pantelis
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Shulga, Anastasia
author_sort Mezes, Magdolna
collection PubMed
description Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a stable manner in healthy participants and enhances voluntary motor output in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We further investigated the impact of settings of this PAS variant on MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. In experiment 1, we compared 0.2-Hz vs 0.4-Hz PAS. In experiment 2, PNS frequencies of 100 Hz, 200 Hz, and 400 Hz were compared. In experiment 3, we added a second TMS pulse. When compared with 0.4-Hz PAS, 0.2-Hz PAS was significantly more effective after 30 minutes (p = 0.05) and 60 minutes (p = 0.014). MEP potentiation by PAS with 100-Hz and 200-Hz PNS did not differ. PAS with 400-Hz PNS was less effective than 100-Hz (p = 0.023) and 200-Hz (p = 0.013) PNS. Adding an extra TMS pulse rendered PAS strongly inhibitory. These negative findings demonstrate that the 0.2-Hz PAS with 100-Hz PNS previously used in clinical studies is optimal and the modifications employed here do not enhance its efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7259644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72596442020-06-08 The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component Mezes, Magdolna Havu, Roope Tolmacheva, Aleksandra Lioumis, Pantelis Mäkelä, Jyrki P. Shulga, Anastasia PLoS One Research Article Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to induce plastic changes in the corticospinal tract. PAS employing single 0.2-Hz TMS pulses synchronized with the first pulse of 50–100 Hz PNS trains potentiates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a stable manner in healthy participants and enhances voluntary motor output in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We further investigated the impact of settings of this PAS variant on MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. In experiment 1, we compared 0.2-Hz vs 0.4-Hz PAS. In experiment 2, PNS frequencies of 100 Hz, 200 Hz, and 400 Hz were compared. In experiment 3, we added a second TMS pulse. When compared with 0.4-Hz PAS, 0.2-Hz PAS was significantly more effective after 30 minutes (p = 0.05) and 60 minutes (p = 0.014). MEP potentiation by PAS with 100-Hz and 200-Hz PNS did not differ. PAS with 400-Hz PNS was less effective than 100-Hz (p = 0.023) and 200-Hz (p = 0.013) PNS. Adding an extra TMS pulse rendered PAS strongly inhibitory. These negative findings demonstrate that the 0.2-Hz PAS with 100-Hz PNS previously used in clinical studies is optimal and the modifications employed here do not enhance its efficacy. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259644/ /pubmed/32470028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999 Text en © 2020 Mezes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mezes, Magdolna
Havu, Roope
Tolmacheva, Aleksandra
Lioumis, Pantelis
Mäkelä, Jyrki P.
Shulga, Anastasia
The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title_full The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title_fullStr The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title_full_unstemmed The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title_short The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component
title_sort impact of tms and pns frequencies on mep potentiation in pas with high-frequency peripheral component
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233999
work_keys_str_mv AT mezesmagdolna theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT havuroope theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT tolmachevaaleksandra theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT lioumispantelis theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT makelajyrkip theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT shulgaanastasia theimpactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT mezesmagdolna impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT havuroope impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT tolmachevaaleksandra impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT lioumispantelis impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT makelajyrkip impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent
AT shulgaanastasia impactoftmsandpnsfrequenciesonmeppotentiationinpaswithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponent