Cargando…
Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are common fractures and the cornerstone of treatment remains immobilization of the wrist in a cast. At present, there is a scarcity of studies that compare different cast immobilization methods. The objective of the study was therefore to compare volar-flexion an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232153 |
_version_ | 1783540175196913664 |
---|---|
author | Raittio, Lauri Launonen, Antti P. Hevonkorpi, Teemu Luokkala, Toni Kukkonen, Juha Reito, Aleksi Laitinen, Minna K. Mattila, Ville M. |
author_facet | Raittio, Lauri Launonen, Antti P. Hevonkorpi, Teemu Luokkala, Toni Kukkonen, Juha Reito, Aleksi Laitinen, Minna K. Mattila, Ville M. |
author_sort | Raittio, Lauri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are common fractures and the cornerstone of treatment remains immobilization of the wrist in a cast. At present, there is a scarcity of studies that compare different cast immobilization methods. The objective of the study was therefore to compare volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast to functional cast position in the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fracture among elderly patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial in three emergency centers in Finland. After closed reduction of the fracture, the wrist was placed in either volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast or functional cast position. The follow-up was 12 months. The primary outcome was patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score at 12 months. The secondary outcomes were Quick-DASH score, grip strength, health-related quality of life (15D), and pain catastrophizing scale. The number of complications was also recorded. In total, 105 participants were included in the study. Of these, 88% were female and the mean age was 73.5 (range 65–94) years. In the primary analysis, the mean difference in patient-rated wrist evaluation measure between groups was -4.9 (95% CI: -13.1.– 3.4., p = .24) in favor of the functional cast position. Operative treatment due to loss of reduction of fracture was performed for four patients (8%) in the FC group and for seven patients (13%) in the volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast group (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.16–2.1). CONCLUSION: In this study, the data were consistent with a wide range of treatment effects when comparing two different cast positions in the treatment of distal radius fracture among elderly patients at 12-month follow-up. However, the functional cast is more likely to be superior when compared to volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02894983 Accessible: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02894983 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7259650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72596502020-06-08 Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial Raittio, Lauri Launonen, Antti P. Hevonkorpi, Teemu Luokkala, Toni Kukkonen, Juha Reito, Aleksi Laitinen, Minna K. Mattila, Ville M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are common fractures and the cornerstone of treatment remains immobilization of the wrist in a cast. At present, there is a scarcity of studies that compare different cast immobilization methods. The objective of the study was therefore to compare volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast to functional cast position in the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fracture among elderly patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial in three emergency centers in Finland. After closed reduction of the fracture, the wrist was placed in either volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast or functional cast position. The follow-up was 12 months. The primary outcome was patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score at 12 months. The secondary outcomes were Quick-DASH score, grip strength, health-related quality of life (15D), and pain catastrophizing scale. The number of complications was also recorded. In total, 105 participants were included in the study. Of these, 88% were female and the mean age was 73.5 (range 65–94) years. In the primary analysis, the mean difference in patient-rated wrist evaluation measure between groups was -4.9 (95% CI: -13.1.– 3.4., p = .24) in favor of the functional cast position. Operative treatment due to loss of reduction of fracture was performed for four patients (8%) in the FC group and for seven patients (13%) in the volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast group (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.16–2.1). CONCLUSION: In this study, the data were consistent with a wide range of treatment effects when comparing two different cast positions in the treatment of distal radius fracture among elderly patients at 12-month follow-up. However, the functional cast is more likely to be superior when compared to volar-flexion and ulnar deviation cast. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02894983 Accessible: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02894983 Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259650/ /pubmed/32469881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232153 Text en © 2020 Raittio et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Raittio, Lauri Launonen, Antti P. Hevonkorpi, Teemu Luokkala, Toni Kukkonen, Juha Reito, Aleksi Laitinen, Minna K. Mattila, Ville M. Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title | Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | two casting methods compared in patients with colles' fracture: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raittiolauri twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT launonenanttip twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hevonkorpiteemu twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luokkalatoni twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kukkonenjuha twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reitoaleksi twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laitinenminnak twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mattilavillem twocastingmethodscomparedinpatientswithcollesfractureapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial |