Cargando…

What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation

BACKGROUND: Rigorous monitoring supports progress in achieving maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity reductions. Recent work to strengthen measurement for maternal and newborn health highlights the existence of a large number of indicators being used for this purpose. The definitions and data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benova, Lenka, Moller, Ann-Beth, Hill, Kathleen, Vaz, Lara M. E., Morgan, Alison, Hanson, Claudia, Semrau, Katherine, Al Arifeen, Shams, Moran, Allisyn C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233969
_version_ 1783540203756978176
author Benova, Lenka
Moller, Ann-Beth
Hill, Kathleen
Vaz, Lara M. E.
Morgan, Alison
Hanson, Claudia
Semrau, Katherine
Al Arifeen, Shams
Moran, Allisyn C.
author_facet Benova, Lenka
Moller, Ann-Beth
Hill, Kathleen
Vaz, Lara M. E.
Morgan, Alison
Hanson, Claudia
Semrau, Katherine
Al Arifeen, Shams
Moran, Allisyn C.
author_sort Benova, Lenka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rigorous monitoring supports progress in achieving maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity reductions. Recent work to strengthen measurement for maternal and newborn health highlights the existence of a large number of indicators being used for this purpose. The definitions and data sources used to produce indicator estimates vary and challenges exist with completeness, accuracy, transparency, and timeliness of data. The objective of this study is to create a conceptual overview of how indicator validity is defined and understood by those who develop and use maternal and newborn health indicators. METHODS: A conceptual framework of validity was developed using mixed methods. We were guided by principles for conceptual frameworks and by a review of the literature and key maternal and newborn health indicator guidance documents. We also conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 key informants chosen through purposive sampling. RESULTS: We categorised indicator validity into three main types: criterion, convergent, and construct. Criterion or diagnostic validity, comparing a measure with a gold standard, has predominantly been used to assess indicators of care coverage and content. Studies assessing convergent validity quantify the extent to which two or more indicator measurement approaches, none of which is a gold-standard, relate. Key informants considered construct validity, or the accuracy of the operationalisation of a concept or phenomenon, a critical part of the overall assessment of indicator validity. CONCLUSION: Given concerns about the large number of maternal and newborn health indicators currently in use, a more consistent understanding of validity can help guide prioritization of key indicators and inform development of new indicators. All three types of validity are relevant for evaluating the performance of maternal and newborn health indicators. We highlight the need to establish a common language and understanding of indicator validity among the various global and local stakeholders working within maternal and newborn health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7259779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72597792020-06-08 What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation Benova, Lenka Moller, Ann-Beth Hill, Kathleen Vaz, Lara M. E. Morgan, Alison Hanson, Claudia Semrau, Katherine Al Arifeen, Shams Moran, Allisyn C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rigorous monitoring supports progress in achieving maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity reductions. Recent work to strengthen measurement for maternal and newborn health highlights the existence of a large number of indicators being used for this purpose. The definitions and data sources used to produce indicator estimates vary and challenges exist with completeness, accuracy, transparency, and timeliness of data. The objective of this study is to create a conceptual overview of how indicator validity is defined and understood by those who develop and use maternal and newborn health indicators. METHODS: A conceptual framework of validity was developed using mixed methods. We were guided by principles for conceptual frameworks and by a review of the literature and key maternal and newborn health indicator guidance documents. We also conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 key informants chosen through purposive sampling. RESULTS: We categorised indicator validity into three main types: criterion, convergent, and construct. Criterion or diagnostic validity, comparing a measure with a gold standard, has predominantly been used to assess indicators of care coverage and content. Studies assessing convergent validity quantify the extent to which two or more indicator measurement approaches, none of which is a gold-standard, relate. Key informants considered construct validity, or the accuracy of the operationalisation of a concept or phenomenon, a critical part of the overall assessment of indicator validity. CONCLUSION: Given concerns about the large number of maternal and newborn health indicators currently in use, a more consistent understanding of validity can help guide prioritization of key indicators and inform development of new indicators. All three types of validity are relevant for evaluating the performance of maternal and newborn health indicators. We highlight the need to establish a common language and understanding of indicator validity among the various global and local stakeholders working within maternal and newborn health. Public Library of Science 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7259779/ /pubmed/32470019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233969 Text en © 2020 Benova et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benova, Lenka
Moller, Ann-Beth
Hill, Kathleen
Vaz, Lara M. E.
Morgan, Alison
Hanson, Claudia
Semrau, Katherine
Al Arifeen, Shams
Moran, Allisyn C.
What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title_full What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title_fullStr What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title_full_unstemmed What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title_short What is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? A conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
title_sort what is meant by validity in maternal and newborn health measurement? a conceptual framework for understanding indicator validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233969
work_keys_str_mv AT benovalenka whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT mollerannbeth whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT hillkathleen whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT vazlarame whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT morganalison whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT hansonclaudia whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT semraukatherine whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT alarifeenshams whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation
AT moranallisync whatismeantbyvalidityinmaternalandnewbornhealthmeasurementaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingindicatorvalidation