Cargando…

Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression

BACKGROUND: Static [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET images are currently used for identifying patients with glioma recurrence/progression after treatment, although the additional diagnostic value of dynamic parameters remains unknown in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of stati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaragori, Timothée, Ginet, Merwan, Marie, Pierre-Yves, Roch, Véronique, Grignon, Rachel, Gauchotte, Guillaume, Rech, Fabien, Blonski, Marie, Lamiral, Zohra, Taillandier, Luc, Imbert, Laëtitia, Verger, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32472232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00645-x
_version_ 1783540291150544896
author Zaragori, Timothée
Ginet, Merwan
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Roch, Véronique
Grignon, Rachel
Gauchotte, Guillaume
Rech, Fabien
Blonski, Marie
Lamiral, Zohra
Taillandier, Luc
Imbert, Laëtitia
Verger, Antoine
author_facet Zaragori, Timothée
Ginet, Merwan
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Roch, Véronique
Grignon, Rachel
Gauchotte, Guillaume
Rech, Fabien
Blonski, Marie
Lamiral, Zohra
Taillandier, Luc
Imbert, Laëtitia
Verger, Antoine
author_sort Zaragori, Timothée
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Static [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET images are currently used for identifying patients with glioma recurrence/progression after treatment, although the additional diagnostic value of dynamic parameters remains unknown in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence/progression as well as assess further relationships with patient outcome. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent an [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET for a suspected glioma recurrence/progression at post-resection MRI, were retrospectively included. Static parameters, including mean and maximum tumor-to-normal-brain (TBR) ratios, tumor-to-striatum (TSR) ratios, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV), as well as dynamic parameters with time-to-peak (TTP) values and curve slope, were tested for predicting the following: (1) glioma recurrence/progression at 6 months after the PET exam and (2) survival on longer follow-up. RESULTS: All static parameters were significant predictors of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy ≥ 94%) with all parameters also associated with mean progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population (all p < 0.001, 29.7 vs. 0.4 months for TBR(max), TSR(max), and MTV). The curve slope was the sole dynamic PET predictor of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy = 76.5%) and was also associated with mean PFS (p < 0.001, 18.0 vs. 0.4 months). However, no additional information was provided relative to static parameters in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Although patients with glioma recurrence/progression can be detected by both static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters, most of this diagnostic information can be achieved by conventional static parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7260331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72603312020-06-08 Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression Zaragori, Timothée Ginet, Merwan Marie, Pierre-Yves Roch, Véronique Grignon, Rachel Gauchotte, Guillaume Rech, Fabien Blonski, Marie Lamiral, Zohra Taillandier, Luc Imbert, Laëtitia Verger, Antoine EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Static [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET images are currently used for identifying patients with glioma recurrence/progression after treatment, although the additional diagnostic value of dynamic parameters remains unknown in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence/progression as well as assess further relationships with patient outcome. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent an [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET for a suspected glioma recurrence/progression at post-resection MRI, were retrospectively included. Static parameters, including mean and maximum tumor-to-normal-brain (TBR) ratios, tumor-to-striatum (TSR) ratios, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV), as well as dynamic parameters with time-to-peak (TTP) values and curve slope, were tested for predicting the following: (1) glioma recurrence/progression at 6 months after the PET exam and (2) survival on longer follow-up. RESULTS: All static parameters were significant predictors of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy ≥ 94%) with all parameters also associated with mean progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population (all p < 0.001, 29.7 vs. 0.4 months for TBR(max), TSR(max), and MTV). The curve slope was the sole dynamic PET predictor of glioma recurrence/progression (accuracy = 76.5%) and was also associated with mean PFS (p < 0.001, 18.0 vs. 0.4 months). However, no additional information was provided relative to static parameters in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Although patients with glioma recurrence/progression can be detected by both static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters, most of this diagnostic information can be achieved by conventional static parameters. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7260331/ /pubmed/32472232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00645-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zaragori, Timothée
Ginet, Merwan
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Roch, Véronique
Grignon, Rachel
Gauchotte, Guillaume
Rech, Fabien
Blonski, Marie
Lamiral, Zohra
Taillandier, Luc
Imbert, Laëtitia
Verger, Antoine
Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title_full Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title_fullStr Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title_full_unstemmed Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title_short Use of static and dynamic [(18)F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
title_sort use of static and dynamic [(18)f]-f-dopa pet parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32472232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00645-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zaragoritimothee useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT ginetmerwan useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT mariepierreyves useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT rochveronique useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT grignonrachel useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT gauchotteguillaume useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT rechfabien useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT blonskimarie useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT lamiralzohra useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT taillandierluc useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT imbertlaetitia useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression
AT vergerantoine useofstaticanddynamic18ffdopapetparametersfordetectingpatientswithgliomarecurrenceorprogression