Cargando…

Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahoney, B., Walklet, E., Bradley, E., Thrush, S., Skillman, J., Whisker, L., Barnes, N., Holcombe, C., Potter, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32181587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275
_version_ 1783540308941733888
author Mahoney, B.
Walklet, E.
Bradley, E.
Thrush, S.
Skillman, J.
Whisker, L.
Barnes, N.
Holcombe, C.
Potter, S.
author_facet Mahoney, B.
Walklet, E.
Bradley, E.
Thrush, S.
Skillman, J.
Whisker, L.
Barnes, N.
Holcombe, C.
Potter, S.
author_sort Mahoney, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision‐making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Twenty‐four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22–74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about ‘early‐warning’ signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss. CONCLUSION: Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient‐centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7260419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72604192020-06-01 Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study Mahoney, B. Walklet, E. Bradley, E. Thrush, S. Skillman, J. Whisker, L. Barnes, N. Holcombe, C. Potter, S. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision‐making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Twenty‐four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22–74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about ‘early‐warning’ signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss. CONCLUSION: Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient‐centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7260419/ /pubmed/32181587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mahoney, B.
Walklet, E.
Bradley, E.
Thrush, S.
Skillman, J.
Whisker, L.
Barnes, N.
Holcombe, C.
Potter, S.
Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title_full Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title_fullStr Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title_short Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
title_sort experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32181587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275
work_keys_str_mv AT mahoneyb experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT walklete experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT bradleye experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT thrushs experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT skillmanj experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT whiskerl experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT barnesn experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT holcombec experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy
AT potters experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy