Cargando…
Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32181587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275 |
_version_ | 1783540308941733888 |
---|---|
author | Mahoney, B. Walklet, E. Bradley, E. Thrush, S. Skillman, J. Whisker, L. Barnes, N. Holcombe, C. Potter, S. |
author_facet | Mahoney, B. Walklet, E. Bradley, E. Thrush, S. Skillman, J. Whisker, L. Barnes, N. Holcombe, C. Potter, S. |
author_sort | Mahoney, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision‐making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Twenty‐four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22–74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about ‘early‐warning’ signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss. CONCLUSION: Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient‐centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7260419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72604192020-06-01 Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study Mahoney, B. Walklet, E. Bradley, E. Thrush, S. Skillman, J. Whisker, L. Barnes, N. Holcombe, C. Potter, S. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision‐making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Twenty‐four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22–74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about ‘early‐warning’ signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss. CONCLUSION: Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient‐centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7260419/ /pubmed/32181587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mahoney, B. Walklet, E. Bradley, E. Thrush, S. Skillman, J. Whisker, L. Barnes, N. Holcombe, C. Potter, S. Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title | Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title_full | Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title_short | Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
title_sort | experiences of implant loss after immediate implant‐based breast reconstruction: qualitative study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32181587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahoneyb experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT walklete experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT bradleye experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT thrushs experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT skillmanj experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT whiskerl experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT barnesn experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT holcombec experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy AT potters experiencesofimplantlossafterimmediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionqualitativestudy |