Cargando…

Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle

BACKGROUND: The anteroposterior view of the lumbar plain radiograph (AP-LPR) was chosen as the original and first radiographic tool to determine and classify lumbosacral transitional vertebra with morphological abnormality (MA-LSTV) according to the Castellvi classification. However, recent studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Lisheng, Bai, Xuedong, Li, Haifeng, Gao, Tianjun, Li, Wei, Wen, Tianyong, He, Qing, Ruan, Dike, Shi, Lijing, Bing, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03358-3
_version_ 1783540399658237952
author Hou, Lisheng
Bai, Xuedong
Li, Haifeng
Gao, Tianjun
Li, Wei
Wen, Tianyong
He, Qing
Ruan, Dike
Shi, Lijing
Bing, Wei
author_facet Hou, Lisheng
Bai, Xuedong
Li, Haifeng
Gao, Tianjun
Li, Wei
Wen, Tianyong
He, Qing
Ruan, Dike
Shi, Lijing
Bing, Wei
author_sort Hou, Lisheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The anteroposterior view of the lumbar plain radiograph (AP-LPR) was chosen as the original and first radiographic tool to determine and classify lumbosacral transitional vertebra with morphological abnormality (MA-LSTV) according to the Castellvi classification. However, recent studies found that AP-LPR might not be sufficient to detect or classify MA-LSTV correctly. The present study aims to verify the reliability of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types, taking coronal reconstructed CT images (CT-CRIs) as the gold criteria. METHODS: Patients with suspected MA-LSTVs determined by AP-LPR were initially enrolled. Among them, those who received CT-CRIs were formally enrolled to verify the sensitivity of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types according to the Castellvi classification principle. RESULTS: A total of 298 cases were initially enrolled as suspected MA-LSTV, among which 91 cases who received CT-CRIs were enrolled into the final study group. All suspected MA-LSTVs were verified to be real MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs. However, 35.2% of the suspected MA-LSTV types judged by AP-LPR were not consistent with the final types judged by CT-CRIs. Two suspected type IIIa and 20 suspected type IIIb MA-LSTVs were verified to be true, while 9 of 39 suspected type IIa, 9 and 3 of 17 suspected type IIb, and 11 of 13 suspected type IV MA-LSTVs were verified to truly be type IIIa, IIIb, IV and IIIb MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs, respectively. Incomplete joint-like structure (JLS) or bony union structure (BUS) and remnants of sclerotic band (RSB) between the transverse process (TP) and sacrum were considered to be the main reasons for misclassification. CONCLUSION: Although AP-LPR could correctly detect MA-LSTV, it could not give accurate type classification. CT-CRIs could provide detailed information between the TP and sacrum area and could be taken as the gold standard to detect and classify MA-LSTV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7260820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72608202020-06-07 Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle Hou, Lisheng Bai, Xuedong Li, Haifeng Gao, Tianjun Li, Wei Wen, Tianyong He, Qing Ruan, Dike Shi, Lijing Bing, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The anteroposterior view of the lumbar plain radiograph (AP-LPR) was chosen as the original and first radiographic tool to determine and classify lumbosacral transitional vertebra with morphological abnormality (MA-LSTV) according to the Castellvi classification. However, recent studies found that AP-LPR might not be sufficient to detect or classify MA-LSTV correctly. The present study aims to verify the reliability of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types, taking coronal reconstructed CT images (CT-CRIs) as the gold criteria. METHODS: Patients with suspected MA-LSTVs determined by AP-LPR were initially enrolled. Among them, those who received CT-CRIs were formally enrolled to verify the sensitivity of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types according to the Castellvi classification principle. RESULTS: A total of 298 cases were initially enrolled as suspected MA-LSTV, among which 91 cases who received CT-CRIs were enrolled into the final study group. All suspected MA-LSTVs were verified to be real MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs. However, 35.2% of the suspected MA-LSTV types judged by AP-LPR were not consistent with the final types judged by CT-CRIs. Two suspected type IIIa and 20 suspected type IIIb MA-LSTVs were verified to be true, while 9 of 39 suspected type IIa, 9 and 3 of 17 suspected type IIb, and 11 of 13 suspected type IV MA-LSTVs were verified to truly be type IIIa, IIIb, IV and IIIb MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs, respectively. Incomplete joint-like structure (JLS) or bony union structure (BUS) and remnants of sclerotic band (RSB) between the transverse process (TP) and sacrum were considered to be the main reasons for misclassification. CONCLUSION: Although AP-LPR could correctly detect MA-LSTV, it could not give accurate type classification. CT-CRIs could provide detailed information between the TP and sacrum area and could be taken as the gold standard to detect and classify MA-LSTV. BioMed Central 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7260820/ /pubmed/32471475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03358-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hou, Lisheng
Bai, Xuedong
Li, Haifeng
Gao, Tianjun
Li, Wei
Wen, Tianyong
He, Qing
Ruan, Dike
Shi, Lijing
Bing, Wei
Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title_full Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title_fullStr Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title_short Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle
title_sort lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to castellvi classification principle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03358-3
work_keys_str_mv AT houlisheng lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT baixuedong lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT lihaifeng lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT gaotianjun lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT liwei lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT wentianyong lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT heqing lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT ruandike lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT shilijing lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple
AT bingwei lumbarplainradiographisnotreliabletoidentifylumbosacraltransitionalvertebratypesaccordingtocastellviclassificationprinciple