Cargando…
qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department
OBJECTIVE: The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3) task force recently introduced qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) as a score for detection of patients at risk of sepsis outside of intensive care units. We performed this study to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494253 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031 |
_version_ | 1783540416935624704 |
---|---|
author | Shahsavarinia, Kavous Moharramzadeh, Payman Arvanagi, Reza Jamal Mahmoodpoor, Ata |
author_facet | Shahsavarinia, Kavous Moharramzadeh, Payman Arvanagi, Reza Jamal Mahmoodpoor, Ata |
author_sort | Shahsavarinia, Kavous |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3) task force recently introduced qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) as a score for detection of patients at risk of sepsis outside of intensive care units. We performed this study to evaluate the validity of qSOFA for early detection and risk stratification of septic patients in emergency department. METHODS: We conducted this study in an emergency department of the largest university affiliated hospital in northwest of Iran from Sept 2015 to Sept 2016. One hundred and forty patients who were SIRS positive with a suspected infection without alternative diagnosis and a microbiological proven infection were enrolled in this study. qSOFA was calculated for each patient and correlated with sepsis grades and mortality. RESULTS: From 140 patients 84 (60%) had positive qSOFA score and 56 (40%) patients had negative qSOFA score. Our results showed that near half of patients with positive qSOFA expired during their stay in hospital while this was about 5% for patients with negative qSOFA. ROC curve of study regarding prediction of outcome with qSOFA showed an area under curve of 0.59. (P value: 0.04). Time spent to sepsis detection was 16 minutes shorter with qSOFA score compared to SIRS criteria in this study. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected sepsis, qSOFA has acceptable value for risk stratification of severity, multi organ failure and mortality. It seems that education of medical staff and frequent screening of patients for warning signs can help to increase the value of qSOFA in prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7260919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72609192020-06-02 qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department Shahsavarinia, Kavous Moharramzadeh, Payman Arvanagi, Reza Jamal Mahmoodpoor, Ata Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3) task force recently introduced qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) as a score for detection of patients at risk of sepsis outside of intensive care units. We performed this study to evaluate the validity of qSOFA for early detection and risk stratification of septic patients in emergency department. METHODS: We conducted this study in an emergency department of the largest university affiliated hospital in northwest of Iran from Sept 2015 to Sept 2016. One hundred and forty patients who were SIRS positive with a suspected infection without alternative diagnosis and a microbiological proven infection were enrolled in this study. qSOFA was calculated for each patient and correlated with sepsis grades and mortality. RESULTS: From 140 patients 84 (60%) had positive qSOFA score and 56 (40%) patients had negative qSOFA score. Our results showed that near half of patients with positive qSOFA expired during their stay in hospital while this was about 5% for patients with negative qSOFA. ROC curve of study regarding prediction of outcome with qSOFA showed an area under curve of 0.59. (P value: 0.04). Time spent to sepsis detection was 16 minutes shorter with qSOFA score compared to SIRS criteria in this study. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected sepsis, qSOFA has acceptable value for risk stratification of severity, multi organ failure and mortality. It seems that education of medical staff and frequent screening of patients for warning signs can help to increase the value of qSOFA in prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients. Professional Medical Publications 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7260919/ /pubmed/32494253 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shahsavarinia, Kavous Moharramzadeh, Payman Arvanagi, Reza Jamal Mahmoodpoor, Ata qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title | qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title_full | qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title_fullStr | qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title_short | qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
title_sort | qsofa score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7260919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494253 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahsavariniakavous qsofascoreforpredictionofsepsisoutcomeinemergencydepartment AT moharramzadehpayman qsofascoreforpredictionofsepsisoutcomeinemergencydepartment AT arvanagirezajamal qsofascoreforpredictionofsepsisoutcomeinemergencydepartment AT mahmoodpoorata qsofascoreforpredictionofsepsisoutcomeinemergencydepartment |