Cargando…

Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19

During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the US, there has been considerable media attention regarding several US legislators who traded stocks in late January through February 2020. The concern is that these legislators traded in anticipation of COVID-19 having a major impact on the financial market...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodell, John W., Huynh, Toan Luu Duc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101578
_version_ 1783540491519787008
author Goodell, John W.
Huynh, Toan Luu Duc
author_facet Goodell, John W.
Huynh, Toan Luu Duc
author_sort Goodell, John W.
collection PubMed
description During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the US, there has been considerable media attention regarding several US legislators who traded stocks in late January through February 2020. The concern is that these legislators traded in anticipation of COVID-19 having a major impact on the financial markets, while publicly suggesting otherwise. We consider whether these legislator trades were in a time window, and of a nature, that would be consistent with trading ahead of the market. Towards this end, we assess the reactions of US industries to sudden COVID-related news announcements, concomitantly with an analysis of levels of investor attention to COVID. Results suggest that, at an industry-level, for legislator trading to be “ahead of the market” it needed to have been done prior to February 26, and involving the 15 industries we identify as having abnormal returns, especially medical and pharmaceutical products (positive); restaurants, hotels, and motels (negative); as well as services and utilities. These criteria are met by many of the legislator trades. Our results help to both parameterize concerns about this case of legislator trading; as well as provide insight into the reactions and expectations of investors toward COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7261360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72613602020-06-01 Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19 Goodell, John W. Huynh, Toan Luu Duc Financ Res Lett Article During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the US, there has been considerable media attention regarding several US legislators who traded stocks in late January through February 2020. The concern is that these legislators traded in anticipation of COVID-19 having a major impact on the financial markets, while publicly suggesting otherwise. We consider whether these legislator trades were in a time window, and of a nature, that would be consistent with trading ahead of the market. Towards this end, we assess the reactions of US industries to sudden COVID-related news announcements, concomitantly with an analysis of levels of investor attention to COVID. Results suggest that, at an industry-level, for legislator trading to be “ahead of the market” it needed to have been done prior to February 26, and involving the 15 industries we identify as having abnormal returns, especially medical and pharmaceutical products (positive); restaurants, hotels, and motels (negative); as well as services and utilities. These criteria are met by many of the legislator trades. Our results help to both parameterize concerns about this case of legislator trading; as well as provide insight into the reactions and expectations of investors toward COVID-19. Elsevier Inc. 2020-10 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7261360/ /pubmed/32837361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101578 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Goodell, John W.
Huynh, Toan Luu Duc
Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title_full Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title_fullStr Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title_short Did Congress trade ahead? Considering the reaction of US industries to COVID-19
title_sort did congress trade ahead? considering the reaction of us industries to covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101578
work_keys_str_mv AT goodelljohnw didcongresstradeaheadconsideringthereactionofusindustriestocovid19
AT huynhtoanluuduc didcongresstradeaheadconsideringthereactionofusindustriestocovid19