Cargando…

Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes

AIMS: The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient‐reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flint, Kelsey M., Shah, Sanjiv J., Lewis, Eldrin F., Kao, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12660
_version_ 1783540522069000192
author Flint, Kelsey M.
Shah, Sanjiv J.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Kao, David P.
author_facet Flint, Kelsey M.
Shah, Sanjiv J.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Kao, David P.
author_sort Flint, Kelsey M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient‐reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I‐PRESERVE and CHARM‐Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Complex, data‐driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7261552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72615522020-06-01 Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes Flint, Kelsey M. Shah, Sanjiv J. Lewis, Eldrin F. Kao, David P. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient‐reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I‐PRESERVE and CHARM‐Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Complex, data‐driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7261552/ /pubmed/32160420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12660 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Flint, Kelsey M.
Shah, Sanjiv J.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Kao, David P.
Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title_full Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title_fullStr Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title_full_unstemmed Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title_short Variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
title_sort variation in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12660
work_keys_str_mv AT flintkelseym variationinclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesamongcomplexheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionphenotypes
AT shahsanjivj variationinclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesamongcomplexheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionphenotypes
AT lewiseldrinf variationinclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesamongcomplexheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionphenotypes
AT kaodavidp variationinclinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesamongcomplexheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionphenotypes