Cargando…

Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity

AIMS: The kinetics of recovery‐period oxygen uptake (VO(2)) are affected by the O(2) deficit generated during exercise. However, studies using ramp tests (RTs) and constant work rate tests (CT) have differently characterized VO(2) responses to increased exercise intensity differently. We used these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ichikawa, Yuri, Maeda, Tomoko, Takahashi, Tetsuya, Ashikaga, Kohei, Tanaka, Shiori, Sumi, Yuki, Itoh, Haruki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32212319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12641
_version_ 1783540525122453504
author Ichikawa, Yuri
Maeda, Tomoko
Takahashi, Tetsuya
Ashikaga, Kohei
Tanaka, Shiori
Sumi, Yuki
Itoh, Haruki
author_facet Ichikawa, Yuri
Maeda, Tomoko
Takahashi, Tetsuya
Ashikaga, Kohei
Tanaka, Shiori
Sumi, Yuki
Itoh, Haruki
author_sort Ichikawa, Yuri
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The kinetics of recovery‐period oxygen uptake (VO(2)) are affected by the O(2) deficit generated during exercise. However, studies using ramp tests (RTs) and constant work rate tests (CT) have differently characterized VO(2) responses to increased exercise intensity differently. We used these two types of loading patterns to investigate the effects of low‐intensity, medium‐intensity, and high‐intensity exercises on the half time (T(1/2)) of recovery‐period VO(2) and the mechanism. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten healthy men aged 21.2 ± 0.9 years underwent symptom‐limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests with the ramp protocol to determine their anaerobic threshold. All subjects subsequently underwent three submaximal RT and CT at low, moderate, and high intensities. In all RTs, subjects began exercise by warming up (20 W). In CT, T(1/2) was significantly lengthened as exercise intensity increased (CT‐low: 34.0 ± 3.9 s, CT‐moderate: 39.5 ± 3.5 s, CT‐high:44.6 ± 4.2 s; P < 0.01, ANOVA), whereas no significant change was observed in RT, which began with the same work rate (RT‐low: 46.0 ± 5.7 s, RT‐moderate: 45.7 ± 4.8 s, RT‐high: 44.6 ± 3.5 s, RT‐max: 44.8 ± 3.2 s; P = 0.868, ANOVA). Only high‐intensity exercise resulted in two components (the fast and slow components) of VO(2) decay, reflecting the increased O(2) deficit by anaerobic metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intensity at the beginning of an exercise affects early recovery‐period VO(2), which is a fast component. The T(1/2) of recovery‐period VO(2) occurs during the fast component, and an increase in O(2) deficit affects both the fast and slow components, lengthening the T(1/2). The T(1/2) of recovery‐period VO(2) in CT at moderate or high intensities, even if not symptom limited, can be used to evaluate exercise intolerance and early occurrence of anaerobic metabolism. Submaximal exercise tests may be considered as convenient methods for evaluating exercise tolerance in patients with cardiac failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7261565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72615652020-06-01 Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity Ichikawa, Yuri Maeda, Tomoko Takahashi, Tetsuya Ashikaga, Kohei Tanaka, Shiori Sumi, Yuki Itoh, Haruki ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: The kinetics of recovery‐period oxygen uptake (VO(2)) are affected by the O(2) deficit generated during exercise. However, studies using ramp tests (RTs) and constant work rate tests (CT) have differently characterized VO(2) responses to increased exercise intensity differently. We used these two types of loading patterns to investigate the effects of low‐intensity, medium‐intensity, and high‐intensity exercises on the half time (T(1/2)) of recovery‐period VO(2) and the mechanism. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten healthy men aged 21.2 ± 0.9 years underwent symptom‐limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests with the ramp protocol to determine their anaerobic threshold. All subjects subsequently underwent three submaximal RT and CT at low, moderate, and high intensities. In all RTs, subjects began exercise by warming up (20 W). In CT, T(1/2) was significantly lengthened as exercise intensity increased (CT‐low: 34.0 ± 3.9 s, CT‐moderate: 39.5 ± 3.5 s, CT‐high:44.6 ± 4.2 s; P < 0.01, ANOVA), whereas no significant change was observed in RT, which began with the same work rate (RT‐low: 46.0 ± 5.7 s, RT‐moderate: 45.7 ± 4.8 s, RT‐high: 44.6 ± 3.5 s, RT‐max: 44.8 ± 3.2 s; P = 0.868, ANOVA). Only high‐intensity exercise resulted in two components (the fast and slow components) of VO(2) decay, reflecting the increased O(2) deficit by anaerobic metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intensity at the beginning of an exercise affects early recovery‐period VO(2), which is a fast component. The T(1/2) of recovery‐period VO(2) occurs during the fast component, and an increase in O(2) deficit affects both the fast and slow components, lengthening the T(1/2). The T(1/2) of recovery‐period VO(2) in CT at moderate or high intensities, even if not symptom limited, can be used to evaluate exercise intolerance and early occurrence of anaerobic metabolism. Submaximal exercise tests may be considered as convenient methods for evaluating exercise tolerance in patients with cardiac failure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7261565/ /pubmed/32212319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12641 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Ichikawa, Yuri
Maeda, Tomoko
Takahashi, Tetsuya
Ashikaga, Kohei
Tanaka, Shiori
Sumi, Yuki
Itoh, Haruki
Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title_full Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title_fullStr Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title_full_unstemmed Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title_short Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
title_sort changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32212319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12641
work_keys_str_mv AT ichikawayuri changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT maedatomoko changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT takahashitetsuya changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT ashikagakohei changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT tanakashiori changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT sumiyuki changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity
AT itohharuki changesinoxygenuptakekineticsafterexercisecausedbydifferencesinloadingpatternandexerciseintensity