Cargando…

Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure

AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate is an important factor in management of heart failure (HF). Our objective was to validate eight creatinine‐based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in an HF population against measured glomerular filtration rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonsson, Anna, Viklund, Ida, Jonsson, Andreas, Valham, Fredrik, Bergdahl, Ellinor, Lindmark, Krister, Norberg, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12643
_version_ 1783540529357651968
author Jonsson, Anna
Viklund, Ida
Jonsson, Andreas
Valham, Fredrik
Bergdahl, Ellinor
Lindmark, Krister
Norberg, Helena
author_facet Jonsson, Anna
Viklund, Ida
Jonsson, Andreas
Valham, Fredrik
Bergdahl, Ellinor
Lindmark, Krister
Norberg, Helena
author_sort Jonsson, Anna
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate is an important factor in management of heart failure (HF). Our objective was to validate eight creatinine‐based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in an HF population against measured glomerular filtration rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty‐six HF patients (mean age 68 ± 13 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 45% ± 15) within a single‐centre hospital that underwent (51)Cr‐EDTA clearance between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. eGFR was estimated by means of Cockcroft–Gault ideal and actual weight, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD), simplified MDRD with isotope dilution mass spectroscopy traceable calibration, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, revised Lund–Malmö, full age spectrum, and the Berlin Initiative Study 1. Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 42 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) had the highest precision for MDRD (r = 0.9), followed by revised Lund–Malmö (r = 0.88). All equations except MDRD (mean difference −4.8%) resulted in an overestimation of the renal function. The accuracy was below 75% for all equations except MDRD. CONCLUSIONS: None of the exclusively creatinine‐based methods was accurate in predicting eGFR in HF patients. Our findings suggest that more accurate methods are needed for determining eGFR in patients with HF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7261582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72615822020-06-01 Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure Jonsson, Anna Viklund, Ida Jonsson, Andreas Valham, Fredrik Bergdahl, Ellinor Lindmark, Krister Norberg, Helena ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate is an important factor in management of heart failure (HF). Our objective was to validate eight creatinine‐based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in an HF population against measured glomerular filtration rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty‐six HF patients (mean age 68 ± 13 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 45% ± 15) within a single‐centre hospital that underwent (51)Cr‐EDTA clearance between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. eGFR was estimated by means of Cockcroft–Gault ideal and actual weight, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD), simplified MDRD with isotope dilution mass spectroscopy traceable calibration, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, revised Lund–Malmö, full age spectrum, and the Berlin Initiative Study 1. Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 42 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) had the highest precision for MDRD (r = 0.9), followed by revised Lund–Malmö (r = 0.88). All equations except MDRD (mean difference −4.8%) resulted in an overestimation of the renal function. The accuracy was below 75% for all equations except MDRD. CONCLUSIONS: None of the exclusively creatinine‐based methods was accurate in predicting eGFR in HF patients. Our findings suggest that more accurate methods are needed for determining eGFR in patients with HF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7261582/ /pubmed/32052932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12643 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Jonsson, Anna
Viklund, Ida
Jonsson, Andreas
Valham, Fredrik
Bergdahl, Ellinor
Lindmark, Krister
Norberg, Helena
Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title_full Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title_fullStr Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title_short Comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
title_sort comparison of creatinine‐based methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12643
work_keys_str_mv AT jonssonanna comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT viklundida comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT jonssonandreas comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT valhamfredrik comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT bergdahlellinor comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT lindmarkkrister comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure
AT norberghelena comparisonofcreatininebasedmethodsforestimatingglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailure