Cargando…
Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262 |
_version_ | 1783540600887312384 |
---|---|
author | O'Connor, Ellen Teh, Jiasian Bolton, Damien |
author_facet | O'Connor, Ellen Teh, Jiasian Bolton, Damien |
author_sort | O'Connor, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer. It was only on review of imaging that it became clearly apparent that the 18F-FDG uptake was due to urinary tracer pooling in a trans-urethral resection cavity. Surgeons, oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware of this common pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET in the prostate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7262006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72620062020-06-01 Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist O'Connor, Ellen Teh, Jiasian Bolton, Damien Urol Case Rep Oncology A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer. It was only on review of imaging that it became clearly apparent that the 18F-FDG uptake was due to urinary tracer pooling in a trans-urethral resection cavity. Surgeons, oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware of this common pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET in the prostate. Elsevier 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7262006/ /pubmed/32489895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Oncology O'Connor, Ellen Teh, Jiasian Bolton, Damien Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title | Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title_full | Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title_fullStr | Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title_full_unstemmed | Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title_short | Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
title_sort | pitfalls of fdg-pet in the prostate for the surgical oncologist |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnorellen pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist AT tehjiasian pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist AT boltondamien pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist |