Cargando…

Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist

A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor, Ellen, Teh, Jiasian, Bolton, Damien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262
_version_ 1783540600887312384
author O'Connor, Ellen
Teh, Jiasian
Bolton, Damien
author_facet O'Connor, Ellen
Teh, Jiasian
Bolton, Damien
author_sort O'Connor, Ellen
collection PubMed
description A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer. It was only on review of imaging that it became clearly apparent that the 18F-FDG uptake was due to urinary tracer pooling in a trans-urethral resection cavity. Surgeons, oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware of this common pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET in the prostate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72620062020-06-01 Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist O'Connor, Ellen Teh, Jiasian Bolton, Damien Urol Case Rep Oncology A 78-year-old man was referred for investigation of prostate cancer following incidental uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Despite normal PSA and benign digital rectal exam, he was referred for consideration of trans-perineal biopsy to exclude prostate cancer. It was only on review of imaging that it became clearly apparent that the 18F-FDG uptake was due to urinary tracer pooling in a trans-urethral resection cavity. Surgeons, oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware of this common pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET in the prostate. Elsevier 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7262006/ /pubmed/32489895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Oncology
O'Connor, Ellen
Teh, Jiasian
Bolton, Damien
Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title_full Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title_fullStr Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title_short Pitfalls of FDG-PET in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
title_sort pitfalls of fdg-pet in the prostate for the surgical oncologist
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101262
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorellen pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist
AT tehjiasian pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist
AT boltondamien pitfallsoffdgpetintheprostateforthesurgicaloncologist