Cargando…

Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations

Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are those nanovesicles 30–150 nm in size with a role in cell signalling and potential as biomarkers of disease. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) techniques are commonly used to measure sEV concentration in biofluids. However, this quantification technique can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shearn, Andrew I. U., Aday, Sezin, Ben-Aicha, Soumaya, Carnell-Morris, Pauline, Siupa, Agnieszka, Angelini, Gianni D., Clayton, Aled, Boulanger, Chantal, Punjabi, Prakash, Emanueli, Costanza, Biglino, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00367
_version_ 1783540626462081024
author Shearn, Andrew I. U.
Aday, Sezin
Ben-Aicha, Soumaya
Carnell-Morris, Pauline
Siupa, Agnieszka
Angelini, Gianni D.
Clayton, Aled
Boulanger, Chantal
Punjabi, Prakash
Emanueli, Costanza
Biglino, Giovanni
author_facet Shearn, Andrew I. U.
Aday, Sezin
Ben-Aicha, Soumaya
Carnell-Morris, Pauline
Siupa, Agnieszka
Angelini, Gianni D.
Clayton, Aled
Boulanger, Chantal
Punjabi, Prakash
Emanueli, Costanza
Biglino, Giovanni
author_sort Shearn, Andrew I. U.
collection PubMed
description Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are those nanovesicles 30–150 nm in size with a role in cell signalling and potential as biomarkers of disease. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) techniques are commonly used to measure sEV concentration in biofluids. However, this quantification technique can be susceptible to sample handing and machine settings. Moreover, some classes of lipoproteins are of similar sizes and could therefore confound sEV quantification, particularly in blood-derived preparations, such serum and plasma. Here we have provided methodological information on NTA measurements and systematically investigated potential factors that could interfere with the reliability and repeatability of results obtained when looking at neat biofluids (i.e., human serum and pericardial fluid) obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery and from healthy controls. Data suggest that variables that can affect vesicle quantification include the level of contamination from lipoproteins, number of sample freeze/thaw cycles, sample filtration, using saline-based diluents, video length and keeping the number of particles per frame within defined limits. Those parameters that are of less concern include focus, the “Maximum Jump” setting and the number of videos recorded. However, if these settings are clearly inappropriate the results obtained will be spurious. Similarly, good experimental practice suggests that multiple videos should be recorded. In conclusion, NTA is a perfectible, but still commonly used system for sEVs analyses. Provided users handle their samples with a highly robust and consistent protocol, and accurately report these aspects, they can obtain data that could potentially translate into new clinical biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72624312020-06-10 Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations Shearn, Andrew I. U. Aday, Sezin Ben-Aicha, Soumaya Carnell-Morris, Pauline Siupa, Agnieszka Angelini, Gianni D. Clayton, Aled Boulanger, Chantal Punjabi, Prakash Emanueli, Costanza Biglino, Giovanni Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are those nanovesicles 30–150 nm in size with a role in cell signalling and potential as biomarkers of disease. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) techniques are commonly used to measure sEV concentration in biofluids. However, this quantification technique can be susceptible to sample handing and machine settings. Moreover, some classes of lipoproteins are of similar sizes and could therefore confound sEV quantification, particularly in blood-derived preparations, such serum and plasma. Here we have provided methodological information on NTA measurements and systematically investigated potential factors that could interfere with the reliability and repeatability of results obtained when looking at neat biofluids (i.e., human serum and pericardial fluid) obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery and from healthy controls. Data suggest that variables that can affect vesicle quantification include the level of contamination from lipoproteins, number of sample freeze/thaw cycles, sample filtration, using saline-based diluents, video length and keeping the number of particles per frame within defined limits. Those parameters that are of less concern include focus, the “Maximum Jump” setting and the number of videos recorded. However, if these settings are clearly inappropriate the results obtained will be spurious. Similarly, good experimental practice suggests that multiple videos should be recorded. In conclusion, NTA is a perfectible, but still commonly used system for sEVs analyses. Provided users handle their samples with a highly robust and consistent protocol, and accurately report these aspects, they can obtain data that could potentially translate into new clinical biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7262431/ /pubmed/32528952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00367 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shearn, Aday, Ben-Aicha, Carnell-Morris, Siupa, Angelini, Clayton, Boulanger, Punjabi, Emanueli and Biglino. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Shearn, Andrew I. U.
Aday, Sezin
Ben-Aicha, Soumaya
Carnell-Morris, Pauline
Siupa, Agnieszka
Angelini, Gianni D.
Clayton, Aled
Boulanger, Chantal
Punjabi, Prakash
Emanueli, Costanza
Biglino, Giovanni
Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title_full Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title_fullStr Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title_short Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations
title_sort analysis of neat biofluids obtained during cardiac surgery using nanoparticle tracking analysis: methodological considerations
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00367
work_keys_str_mv AT shearnandrewiu analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT adaysezin analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT benaichasoumaya analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT carnellmorrispauline analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT siupaagnieszka analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT angelinigiannid analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT claytonaled analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT boulangerchantal analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT punjabiprakash analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT emanuelicostanza analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations
AT biglinogiovanni analysisofneatbiofluidsobtainedduringcardiacsurgeryusingnanoparticletrackinganalysismethodologicalconsiderations