Cargando…

A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: In recent years, substantial advances have been made in noninvasive cardiac imaging, including cardiac computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced whole heart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Bin, Chen, Zhiyong, Duan, Qing, Xue, Yunjing, Chen, Lianglong, Zhang, Zhongshuai, An, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00630-2
_version_ 1783540684122226688
author Sun, Bin
Chen, Zhiyong
Duan, Qing
Xue, Yunjing
Chen, Lianglong
Zhang, Zhongshuai
An, Jing
author_facet Sun, Bin
Chen, Zhiyong
Duan, Qing
Xue, Yunjing
Chen, Lianglong
Zhang, Zhongshuai
An, Jing
author_sort Sun, Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, substantial advances have been made in noninvasive cardiac imaging, including cardiac computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced whole heart coronary CMR angiography (CCMRA) to dual-source coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses (≥50%) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for conventional x-ray coronary angiography. METHODS: Our objective was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced whole-heart CCMRA (CE-CCMRA) to dual-source CCTA (DS-CCTA) for the detection of CAD. We prospectively studied 57 symptomatic patients with suspected or known CAD who were scheduled for conventional x-ray coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as an x-ray defined diameter reduction of ≥50% in a coronary artery with a reference diameter of ≥1.5 mm. RESULTS: CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA were completed in 51 (89%) of 57 patients without complications. The acquisition times of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA, respectively, were 9.5 ± 3.1 min and 8.3 ± 1.4 s. On patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA were 93.5% versus 93.5%(P > 0.05), 85% versus 90%(P > 0.05), 90.6% versus 93.5%(P > 0.05), and 89.4% versus 90%(P > 0.05), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.99) for CE-CCMRA and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for DS-CCTA. CONCLUSIONS: DS-CCTA was found to be superior to CE-CCMRA in the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses (≥50%) in patients with suspected or known CAD scheduled for conventional x-ray coronary angiography, owing to shorter scanning times and higher spatial resolution. However, CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA have similar diagnostic accuracies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72627652020-06-07 A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience Sun, Bin Chen, Zhiyong Duan, Qing Xue, Yunjing Chen, Lianglong Zhang, Zhongshuai An, Jing J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: In recent years, substantial advances have been made in noninvasive cardiac imaging, including cardiac computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced whole heart coronary CMR angiography (CCMRA) to dual-source coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses (≥50%) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for conventional x-ray coronary angiography. METHODS: Our objective was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced whole-heart CCMRA (CE-CCMRA) to dual-source CCTA (DS-CCTA) for the detection of CAD. We prospectively studied 57 symptomatic patients with suspected or known CAD who were scheduled for conventional x-ray coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as an x-ray defined diameter reduction of ≥50% in a coronary artery with a reference diameter of ≥1.5 mm. RESULTS: CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA were completed in 51 (89%) of 57 patients without complications. The acquisition times of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA, respectively, were 9.5 ± 3.1 min and 8.3 ± 1.4 s. On patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA were 93.5% versus 93.5%(P > 0.05), 85% versus 90%(P > 0.05), 90.6% versus 93.5%(P > 0.05), and 89.4% versus 90%(P > 0.05), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.99) for CE-CCMRA and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.00) for DS-CCTA. CONCLUSIONS: DS-CCTA was found to be superior to CE-CCMRA in the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses (≥50%) in patients with suspected or known CAD scheduled for conventional x-ray coronary angiography, owing to shorter scanning times and higher spatial resolution. However, CE-CCMRA and DS-CCTA have similar diagnostic accuracies. BioMed Central 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7262765/ /pubmed/32475355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00630-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Bin
Chen, Zhiyong
Duan, Qing
Xue, Yunjing
Chen, Lianglong
Zhang, Zhongshuai
An, Jing
A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title_full A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title_fullStr A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title_short A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
title_sort direct comparison of 3 t contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32475355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00630-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sunbin adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT chenzhiyong adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT duanqing adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT xueyunjing adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT chenlianglong adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT zhangzhongshuai adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT anjing adirectcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT sunbin directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT chenzhiyong directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT duanqing directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT xueyunjing directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT chenlianglong directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT zhangzhongshuai directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience
AT anjing directcomparisonof3tcontrastenhancedwholeheartcoronarycardiovascularmagneticresonanceangiographytodualsourcecomputedtomographyangiographyfordetectionofcoronaryarterystenosisasinglecenterexperience