Comparative Biomechanical Study Between Minimally Invasive Popliteus and LCL Reconstruction Versus LaPrade Technique

BACKGROUND: Many aspects of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee have been extensively studied within the past 20 years. Quantitative anatomic and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the importance of the 3 static stabilizers of the lateral side of the knee: the fibular collateral ligament, the popliteus tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. There are various methods of reconstruction. However, currently, there is no consensus on the preferred reconstruction technique for treating patients with chronic PLC injuries. We have developed a new reconstructive technique for PLC based on tibiofibular-based technique, similar to LaPrade, and this technique is less invasive than the previous techniques. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference between minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction and LaPrade’s method in restoring the posterolateral stability of knees METHODS: Six paired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were assessed in the intact state and then dissected to simulate a grade III posterolateral knee injury. By using a “Blocked randomization”, each paired knee was randomized into 2 groups (1) reconstruction via LaPrade’s method, (2) minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction. Biomechanical testing using varus stress radiographs was performed to compare knee stability between 2 groups. RESULTS: This study included six paired knees, three males and three females. The mean age of the cadaver was 70.8 years (range 57-85 years). No difference was found in the demographic data (sex distribution, lateral opening gap of intact knee and side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap of sectioned knee) between the 2 groups. The side-to-side difference in lateral joint opening on the varus stress radiographs significantly improved after PLC reconstruction in both groups (p <0.001, p <0.001), However, there were no differences between the 2 groups in side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap after reconstruction (Mean difference=-0.05 (95%CI, -0.46 to 0.36); p- value=0.039). CONCLUSION: Biomechanically, minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction is equivalent to LaPrade’s technique in restoring the stability of knees in case of grade III PLC injury. Additionally, this technique is less invasive than all traditional open technique of PLC reconstruction. The minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction technique may be a treatment option for grade III PLC injury. Keywords: posterolateral corner; ligament reconstruction; popliteus tendon; lateral collateral ligament; popliteofibular ligament; knee biomechanics; minimally invasive surgery