Cargando…
Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 7...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087 |
_version_ | 1783540701063020544 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Huijiang Wang, Shuai Fan, Fuxiang Peng, Jingfeng |
author_facet | Zhou, Huijiang Wang, Shuai Fan, Fuxiang Peng, Jingfeng |
author_sort | Zhou, Huijiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 79 patients who underwent primary CBD closure with a knotless unidirectional barbed suture or traditional T-tube drainage after LCBDE for CBD stones. RESULTS: The average suturing time, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the primary closure group than T-tube group. There were no significant differences in the mean diameter of the CBD, number of stones, or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No patients developed recurrence of CBD stones during the median follow-up of 21.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: After LCBDE and intraoperative choledochoscopy, primary closure with knotless unidirectional barbed sutures is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with cholelithiasis and concurrent CBD stones. This is especially true when the CBD is dilated more than 8 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7262853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72628532020-06-10 Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience Zhou, Huijiang Wang, Shuai Fan, Fuxiang Peng, Jingfeng J Int Med Res Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 79 patients who underwent primary CBD closure with a knotless unidirectional barbed suture or traditional T-tube drainage after LCBDE for CBD stones. RESULTS: The average suturing time, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the primary closure group than T-tube group. There were no significant differences in the mean diameter of the CBD, number of stones, or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No patients developed recurrence of CBD stones during the median follow-up of 21.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: After LCBDE and intraoperative choledochoscopy, primary closure with knotless unidirectional barbed sutures is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with cholelithiasis and concurrent CBD stones. This is especially true when the CBD is dilated more than 8 mm. SAGE Publications 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7262853/ /pubmed/31612768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training Zhou, Huijiang Wang, Shuai Fan, Fuxiang Peng, Jingfeng Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title | Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title_full | Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title_fullStr | Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title_short | Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
title_sort | primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience |
topic | Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouhuijiang primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience AT wangshuai primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience AT fanfuxiang primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience AT pengjingfeng primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience |