Cargando…

Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience

OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Huijiang, Wang, Shuai, Fan, Fuxiang, Peng, Jingfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087
_version_ 1783540701063020544
author Zhou, Huijiang
Wang, Shuai
Fan, Fuxiang
Peng, Jingfeng
author_facet Zhou, Huijiang
Wang, Shuai
Fan, Fuxiang
Peng, Jingfeng
author_sort Zhou, Huijiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 79 patients who underwent primary CBD closure with a knotless unidirectional barbed suture or traditional T-tube drainage after LCBDE for CBD stones. RESULTS: The average suturing time, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the primary closure group than T-tube group. There were no significant differences in the mean diameter of the CBD, number of stones, or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No patients developed recurrence of CBD stones during the median follow-up of 21.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: After LCBDE and intraoperative choledochoscopy, primary closure with knotless unidirectional barbed sutures is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with cholelithiasis and concurrent CBD stones. This is especially true when the CBD is dilated more than 8 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72628532020-06-10 Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience Zhou, Huijiang Wang, Shuai Fan, Fuxiang Peng, Jingfeng J Int Med Res Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training OBJECTIVE: Primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a technical challenge. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method. METHODS: This retrospective study of surgical efficacy and safety involved 79 patients who underwent primary CBD closure with a knotless unidirectional barbed suture or traditional T-tube drainage after LCBDE for CBD stones. RESULTS: The average suturing time, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the primary closure group than T-tube group. There were no significant differences in the mean diameter of the CBD, number of stones, or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No patients developed recurrence of CBD stones during the median follow-up of 21.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: After LCBDE and intraoperative choledochoscopy, primary closure with knotless unidirectional barbed sutures is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with cholelithiasis and concurrent CBD stones. This is especially true when the CBD is dilated more than 8 mm. SAGE Publications 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7262853/ /pubmed/31612768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training
Zhou, Huijiang
Wang, Shuai
Fan, Fuxiang
Peng, Jingfeng
Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title_full Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title_fullStr Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title_full_unstemmed Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title_short Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
title_sort primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience
topic Special Issue: Surgical Innovation: New Surgical Devices, Techniques and Progress in Surgical Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519878087
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhuijiang primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience
AT wangshuai primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience
AT fanfuxiang primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience
AT pengjingfeng primaryclosurewithknotlessbarbedsutureversustraditionalttubedrainageafterlaparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationasinglecentermediumtermexperience