Cargando…

Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis

OBJECTIVES: Intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly presents a challenge as the source of morbidity and mortality if not well-treated. This study investigates the functional outcome and revision rate of two of the most common treatments of choice for this condition, Proximal Femoral Nail Antirot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savio, Sherly Desnita, Susila, I Made Arya, Dharmayuda, Cokorda Gde Oka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262865/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00030
_version_ 1783540703829164032
author Savio, Sherly Desnita
Susila, I Made Arya
Dharmayuda, Cokorda Gde Oka
author_facet Savio, Sherly Desnita
Susila, I Made Arya
Dharmayuda, Cokorda Gde Oka
author_sort Savio, Sherly Desnita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly presents a challenge as the source of morbidity and mortality if not well-treated. This study investigates the functional outcome and revision rate of two of the most common treatments of choice for this condition, Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), while furthermore investigate the secondary functional outcome of the two procedures if proceeded to Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify relevant studies through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. A total of 9 studies (2.251 patients) were included, divided into 3 meta-analysis. Random effect model was used for continuous outcomes using Review Manager. RESULTS: For primary Harris Hip Score (HHS), the mean HHS at 12-months follow-up for PFNA (n = 184) was 77.77, as for DHS (n = 187) was 78.33, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.73). The mean revision rates for PFNA (n=784) was 2.68%, as for DHS (n=766) was 2.48%, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.61). For secondary HHS after CTHA, the mean HHS 12-months postoperatively for PFNA (n =142) was 83.97, as for DHS (n = 190) was 83.65, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.59). DISCUSSION: PFNA and DHS can both be considered in osteoporotic intertrochanter femur fracture, as the two procedures offer similar 1-year functional outcome and revision rate. However, PFNA may benefit with less blood loss and operation time. Some potential revision causes, such as peri-implant femoral fracture, infection, and implant failure should always be monitored perioperatively. Furthermore, when CTHA is indicated for revision, the two procedures offer comparable secondary functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Current meta-analysis suggests that PFNA and DHS both have comparable primary functional outcome, revision rate, and post-CTHA secondary functional outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72628652020-06-10 Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis Savio, Sherly Desnita Susila, I Made Arya Dharmayuda, Cokorda Gde Oka Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly presents a challenge as the source of morbidity and mortality if not well-treated. This study investigates the functional outcome and revision rate of two of the most common treatments of choice for this condition, Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), while furthermore investigate the secondary functional outcome of the two procedures if proceeded to Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (CTHA). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify relevant studies through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database. A total of 9 studies (2.251 patients) were included, divided into 3 meta-analysis. Random effect model was used for continuous outcomes using Review Manager. RESULTS: For primary Harris Hip Score (HHS), the mean HHS at 12-months follow-up for PFNA (n = 184) was 77.77, as for DHS (n = 187) was 78.33, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.73). The mean revision rates for PFNA (n=784) was 2.68%, as for DHS (n=766) was 2.48%, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.61). For secondary HHS after CTHA, the mean HHS 12-months postoperatively for PFNA (n =142) was 83.97, as for DHS (n = 190) was 83.65, indicating no significant difference (P = 0.59). DISCUSSION: PFNA and DHS can both be considered in osteoporotic intertrochanter femur fracture, as the two procedures offer similar 1-year functional outcome and revision rate. However, PFNA may benefit with less blood loss and operation time. Some potential revision causes, such as peri-implant femoral fracture, infection, and implant failure should always be monitored perioperatively. Furthermore, when CTHA is indicated for revision, the two procedures offer comparable secondary functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Current meta-analysis suggests that PFNA and DHS both have comparable primary functional outcome, revision rate, and post-CTHA secondary functional outcome. SAGE Publications 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7262865/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00030 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Savio, Sherly Desnita
Susila, I Made Arya
Dharmayuda, Cokorda Gde Oka
Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title_full Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title_fullStr Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title_short Functional Outcome & Revision Rate Of Pfna Vs Dhs For Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Meta Analysis
title_sort functional outcome & revision rate of pfna vs dhs for osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fracture: a meta analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262865/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00030
work_keys_str_mv AT saviosherlydesnita functionaloutcomerevisionrateofpfnavsdhsforosteoporoticintertrochantericfemurfractureametaanalysis
AT susilaimadearya functionaloutcomerevisionrateofpfnavsdhsforosteoporoticintertrochantericfemurfractureametaanalysis
AT dharmayudacokordagdeoka functionaloutcomerevisionrateofpfnavsdhsforosteoporoticintertrochantericfemurfractureametaanalysis