Cargando…

Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Although the use of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R‐EBUS) with a guide sheath has shown improved diagnostic capability in peripheral pulmonary lesions, its utility is still low due to variable performance. To overcome its limitation, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of R‐EBUS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang Chul, Kim, Eun Young, Chang, Joon, Lee, Sang Hoon, Han*, Chang Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32301287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13425
_version_ 1783540718829043712
author Lee, Sang Chul
Kim, Eun Young
Chang, Joon
Lee, Sang Hoon
Han*, Chang Hoon
author_facet Lee, Sang Chul
Kim, Eun Young
Chang, Joon
Lee, Sang Hoon
Han*, Chang Hoon
author_sort Lee, Sang Chul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the use of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R‐EBUS) with a guide sheath has shown improved diagnostic capability in peripheral pulmonary lesions, its utility is still low due to variable performance. To overcome its limitation, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of R‐EBUS combined with transbronchial biopsy (TBB) under fluoroscopic guidance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 74 patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent R‐EBUS combined with TBB or TBB alone as a diagnostic technique. Subjects were grouped according to the diagnostic modality used (R‐EBUS combined with TBB vs. TBB alone). Each group was matched for age, sex, and location of the biopsy. The chi‐square test and paired t‐test were used to compare characteristics and identify factors that affected the diagnostic yield. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 67.4 ± 12.8 years, with 21 (56.8%) men and 16 (43.2%) women in each group. The lesion size was significantly smaller in the R‐EBUS group (23.6 vs. 33.9, P < 0.001). The diagnostic yield with the combined use of R‐EBUS and TBB (27/37, 72.9%) was significantly higher than that with standard TBB alone (22/37, 59.4%). Lung lesions with a positive bronchus sign were associated with a higher diagnostic yield (odds ratio = 3.52 [1.17–10.62]; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of R‐EBUS with TBB resulted in a higher diagnostic yield than either technique alone. Thus, the addition of R‐EBUS biopsy would be helpful to improve the diagnostic yield of TBB. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The combination of R‐EBUS with TBB under fluoroscopic guidance improved the diagnostic yield of PPLs compared to TBB alone. A tissue diagnosis was more likely in pulmonary lesions with the air‐bronchus sign. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The use of R‐EBUS could help improve the low diagnostic yield of TBB under fluoroscopic guidance without increasing the incidence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72629342020-06-03 Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer Lee, Sang Chul Kim, Eun Young Chang, Joon Lee, Sang Hoon Han*, Chang Hoon Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although the use of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R‐EBUS) with a guide sheath has shown improved diagnostic capability in peripheral pulmonary lesions, its utility is still low due to variable performance. To overcome its limitation, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of R‐EBUS combined with transbronchial biopsy (TBB) under fluoroscopic guidance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 74 patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent R‐EBUS combined with TBB or TBB alone as a diagnostic technique. Subjects were grouped according to the diagnostic modality used (R‐EBUS combined with TBB vs. TBB alone). Each group was matched for age, sex, and location of the biopsy. The chi‐square test and paired t‐test were used to compare characteristics and identify factors that affected the diagnostic yield. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 67.4 ± 12.8 years, with 21 (56.8%) men and 16 (43.2%) women in each group. The lesion size was significantly smaller in the R‐EBUS group (23.6 vs. 33.9, P < 0.001). The diagnostic yield with the combined use of R‐EBUS and TBB (27/37, 72.9%) was significantly higher than that with standard TBB alone (22/37, 59.4%). Lung lesions with a positive bronchus sign were associated with a higher diagnostic yield (odds ratio = 3.52 [1.17–10.62]; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of R‐EBUS with TBB resulted in a higher diagnostic yield than either technique alone. Thus, the addition of R‐EBUS biopsy would be helpful to improve the diagnostic yield of TBB. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The combination of R‐EBUS with TBB under fluoroscopic guidance improved the diagnostic yield of PPLs compared to TBB alone. A tissue diagnosis was more likely in pulmonary lesions with the air‐bronchus sign. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The use of R‐EBUS could help improve the low diagnostic yield of TBB under fluoroscopic guidance without increasing the incidence of complications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-04-16 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7262934/ /pubmed/32301287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13425 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lee, Sang Chul
Kim, Eun Young
Chang, Joon
Lee, Sang Hoon
Han*, Chang Hoon
Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title_full Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title_short Diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
title_sort diagnostic value of the combined use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial biopsy in lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32301287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13425
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangchul diagnosticvalueofthecombineduseofradialprobeendobronchialultrasoundandtransbronchialbiopsyinlungcancer
AT kimeunyoung diagnosticvalueofthecombineduseofradialprobeendobronchialultrasoundandtransbronchialbiopsyinlungcancer
AT changjoon diagnosticvalueofthecombineduseofradialprobeendobronchialultrasoundandtransbronchialbiopsyinlungcancer
AT leesanghoon diagnosticvalueofthecombineduseofradialprobeendobronchialultrasoundandtransbronchialbiopsyinlungcancer
AT hanchanghoon diagnosticvalueofthecombineduseofradialprobeendobronchialultrasoundandtransbronchialbiopsyinlungcancer