Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM+DOC) is expected to prolong survival in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the efficacy and safety for older patients remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM+DOC in patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakaguchi, Tadashi, Furuya, Naoki, Ito, Kentaro, Hida, Naoya, Morikawa, Kei, Komase, Yuko, Inoue, Takeo, Hataji, Osamu, Mineshita, Masamichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13429
_version_ 1783540720762617856
author Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Furuya, Naoki
Ito, Kentaro
Hida, Naoya
Morikawa, Kei
Komase, Yuko
Inoue, Takeo
Hataji, Osamu
Mineshita, Masamichi
author_facet Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Furuya, Naoki
Ito, Kentaro
Hida, Naoya
Morikawa, Kei
Komase, Yuko
Inoue, Takeo
Hataji, Osamu
Mineshita, Masamichi
author_sort Sakaguchi, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM+DOC) is expected to prolong survival in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the efficacy and safety for older patients remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM+DOC in patients 75 years and older. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who had received RAM+DOC treatment at three institutions. We compared the efficacy and safety in patients 75 years and older to those under 75 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were identified. The median progression‐free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival was 3.6 (95% CI: 0.4–6.7), 3.1 (95% CI: 2.4–3.9) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 5.6–16.8) in the older group (N = 23), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.3–5.0), 3.4 (95% CI: 3.3–5.0) and 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.1–15.4) in the younger group (N = 91), respectively. Survival curves were similar for each group, while the objective response rate was 30.4% (95% CI: 13.2–52.9%) in older patients and 35.2% (95% CI, 25.4–45.9%) for the younger group. A total of 22 older patients (95.7%) and 73 (80.2%) younger patients received primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐G‐CSF). Four older patients (17.3%) and 14 younger patients (15.3%) discontinued RAM+DOC due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RAM+DOC is expected to be efficacious and tolerable in older patients when supported with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF therapy. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study ・PFS, OS, and ORR in older patients were similar to those under 75 years of age. ・Safety of RAM+DOC was well tolerated in older patients with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF. ・Prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF with RAM+DOC may contribute to better efficacy. What this study adds ・This study suggests that RAM+DOC with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF is expected to be a useful option in older patients with advanced NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7262941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72629412020-06-03 The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer Sakaguchi, Tadashi Furuya, Naoki Ito, Kentaro Hida, Naoya Morikawa, Kei Komase, Yuko Inoue, Takeo Hataji, Osamu Mineshita, Masamichi Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM+DOC) is expected to prolong survival in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the efficacy and safety for older patients remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM+DOC in patients 75 years and older. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who had received RAM+DOC treatment at three institutions. We compared the efficacy and safety in patients 75 years and older to those under 75 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were identified. The median progression‐free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival was 3.6 (95% CI: 0.4–6.7), 3.1 (95% CI: 2.4–3.9) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 5.6–16.8) in the older group (N = 23), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.3–5.0), 3.4 (95% CI: 3.3–5.0) and 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.1–15.4) in the younger group (N = 91), respectively. Survival curves were similar for each group, while the objective response rate was 30.4% (95% CI: 13.2–52.9%) in older patients and 35.2% (95% CI, 25.4–45.9%) for the younger group. A total of 22 older patients (95.7%) and 73 (80.2%) younger patients received primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐G‐CSF). Four older patients (17.3%) and 14 younger patients (15.3%) discontinued RAM+DOC due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RAM+DOC is expected to be efficacious and tolerable in older patients when supported with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF therapy. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study ・PFS, OS, and ORR in older patients were similar to those under 75 years of age. ・Safety of RAM+DOC was well tolerated in older patients with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF. ・Prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF with RAM+DOC may contribute to better efficacy. What this study adds ・This study suggests that RAM+DOC with prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF is expected to be a useful option in older patients with advanced NSCLC. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-04-14 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7262941/ /pubmed/32291896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13429 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Furuya, Naoki
Ito, Kentaro
Hida, Naoya
Morikawa, Kei
Komase, Yuko
Inoue, Takeo
Hataji, Osamu
Mineshita, Masamichi
The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_short The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
title_sort efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13429
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaguchitadashi theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT furuyanaoki theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT itokentaro theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hidanaoya theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT morikawakei theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT komaseyuko theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT inouetakeo theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hatajiosamu theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT mineshitamasamichi theefficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT sakaguchitadashi efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT furuyanaoki efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT itokentaro efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hidanaoya efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT morikawakei efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT komaseyuko efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT inouetakeo efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hatajiosamu efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT mineshitamasamichi efficacyandsafetyoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinolderpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer