Cargando…

Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain

Context and objective Opioids have heterogeneous side effects including a well-known effect of sedation; however, the opposing effect of stimulation, or somatic activation, has been largely ignored or overlooked. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of opioid-induced somatic ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbour, Andrew, Asbury, Melinda L, Riordan, Paul A, Webb, Jason A, Prakken, Steven D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494526
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7911
_version_ 1783540843868585984
author Barbour, Andrew
Asbury, Melinda L
Riordan, Paul A
Webb, Jason A
Prakken, Steven D
author_facet Barbour, Andrew
Asbury, Melinda L
Riordan, Paul A
Webb, Jason A
Prakken, Steven D
author_sort Barbour, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Context and objective Opioids have heterogeneous side effects including a well-known effect of sedation; however, the opposing effect of stimulation, or somatic activation, has been largely ignored or overlooked. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of opioid-induced somatic activation (OISA). Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 189 patients seen by a single clinical psychiatrist/pain specialist. During the initial encounter, the clinician took a standardized history of every opioid currently or previously taken by the patients, and enquired if the patients had experienced a somatically activating or sedating effect per opioid. Results Patients recalled an average exposure to 5.1 opioids (SD: 1.9). Ninety-one patients (48.1%; mean: 1.6) reported somatic activation, while 118 (62.4%; mean: 1.7) reported sedation from at least one opioid. Fifty-eight patients (30.7%) identified at least one opioid as activating, and another as sedating. The distribution of OISA did not significantly differ by gender, race, primary pain diagnosis, or depression. The distribution of OISA by oxycodone significantly differed compared to morphine sulfate (27.3% vs 8.9%; p: 0.005), while sedation did not (29.0% vs 24.3%; p: 0.46). Conclusions In this study, we quantified the previously unstudied phenomenon of OISA. This phenomenon appears dependent on opioid type with some opioids, such as oxycodone, appearing more likely to have this effect. Given current concerns about the risks of opioids in high-risk populations, future studies are needed to study this phenomenon to arrive at an accurate determination of the potential risks and benefits of OISA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7263729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72637292020-06-02 Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain Barbour, Andrew Asbury, Melinda L Riordan, Paul A Webb, Jason A Prakken, Steven D Cureus Anesthesiology Context and objective Opioids have heterogeneous side effects including a well-known effect of sedation; however, the opposing effect of stimulation, or somatic activation, has been largely ignored or overlooked. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of opioid-induced somatic activation (OISA). Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 189 patients seen by a single clinical psychiatrist/pain specialist. During the initial encounter, the clinician took a standardized history of every opioid currently or previously taken by the patients, and enquired if the patients had experienced a somatically activating or sedating effect per opioid. Results Patients recalled an average exposure to 5.1 opioids (SD: 1.9). Ninety-one patients (48.1%; mean: 1.6) reported somatic activation, while 118 (62.4%; mean: 1.7) reported sedation from at least one opioid. Fifty-eight patients (30.7%) identified at least one opioid as activating, and another as sedating. The distribution of OISA did not significantly differ by gender, race, primary pain diagnosis, or depression. The distribution of OISA by oxycodone significantly differed compared to morphine sulfate (27.3% vs 8.9%; p: 0.005), while sedation did not (29.0% vs 24.3%; p: 0.46). Conclusions In this study, we quantified the previously unstudied phenomenon of OISA. This phenomenon appears dependent on opioid type with some opioids, such as oxycodone, appearing more likely to have this effect. Given current concerns about the risks of opioids in high-risk populations, future studies are needed to study this phenomenon to arrive at an accurate determination of the potential risks and benefits of OISA. Cureus 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263729/ /pubmed/32494526 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7911 Text en Copyright © 2020, Barbour et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Barbour, Andrew
Asbury, Melinda L
Riordan, Paul A
Webb, Jason A
Prakken, Steven D
Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title_full Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title_fullStr Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title_full_unstemmed Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title_short Opioid-induced Somatic Activation: Prevalence in a Population of Patients With Chronic Pain
title_sort opioid-induced somatic activation: prevalence in a population of patients with chronic pain
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32494526
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7911
work_keys_str_mv AT barbourandrew opioidinducedsomaticactivationprevalenceinapopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT asburymelindal opioidinducedsomaticactivationprevalenceinapopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT riordanpaula opioidinducedsomaticactivationprevalenceinapopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT webbjasona opioidinducedsomaticactivationprevalenceinapopulationofpatientswithchronicpain
AT prakkenstevend opioidinducedsomaticactivationprevalenceinapopulationofpatientswithchronicpain