Cargando…

Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: Some studies have addressed the influence of optical magnification on the detection of caries lesions using a visual scoring system. However, there is a lack of research related to the use of the CAST and ADA-CCS visual scoring systems. In addition, the reliability and accuracy of ADA-CC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilde, Sabrina, Campos, Priscila-Hernández, Marcondes, Ana-Paula-Marçal, Moura-Netto, Cacio, Novaes, Tatiane-Fernandes, Lussi, Adrian, Diniz, Michele-Baffi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56445
_version_ 1783540851070205952
author Wilde, Sabrina
Campos, Priscila-Hernández
Marcondes, Ana-Paula-Marçal
Moura-Netto, Cacio
Novaes, Tatiane-Fernandes
Lussi, Adrian
Diniz, Michele-Baffi
author_facet Wilde, Sabrina
Campos, Priscila-Hernández
Marcondes, Ana-Paula-Marçal
Moura-Netto, Cacio
Novaes, Tatiane-Fernandes
Lussi, Adrian
Diniz, Michele-Baffi
author_sort Wilde, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some studies have addressed the influence of optical magnification on the detection of caries lesions using a visual scoring system. However, there is a lack of research related to the use of the CAST and ADA-CCS visual scoring systems. In addition, the reliability and accuracy of ADA-CCS index in permanent teeth were not studied yet. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the influence of different levels of optical magnification on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using three visual scoring systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One occlusal site per tooth was analyzed in 120 extracted permanent molars. Two trained examiners inspected the teeth using ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System), CAST (Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment), and ADA-CCS (American Dental Association-Caries Classification System) visual criteria, twice with each scoring system, with a one-week interval between examinations. The study was conducted in three phases: (A) without optical magnification, (B) using a binocular lens (3.5× magnification), and (C) using an operating microscope (16× magnification). Then, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally through the center of the selected site and the section with the more severe lesion was histological evaluated considering the D1 (lesions in enamel and dentin) and D3 (dentin lesions) thresholds. RESULTS: Kappa values for intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility were good to excellent for all systems. At the D1 threshold, sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve were high for ICDAS and CAST in all phases. However, this was not the case for the ADA-CCS in phase C (<0.05). At the D3 diagnostic threshold, there was no significant difference between the visual scoring systems during the study phases (>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The magnification does not improve the accuracy of the visual scoring systems in the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. Key words:Dental caries, caries detection, permanent teeth, visual examination, magnification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7263771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72637712020-06-04 Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study Wilde, Sabrina Campos, Priscila-Hernández Marcondes, Ana-Paula-Marçal Moura-Netto, Cacio Novaes, Tatiane-Fernandes Lussi, Adrian Diniz, Michele-Baffi J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Some studies have addressed the influence of optical magnification on the detection of caries lesions using a visual scoring system. However, there is a lack of research related to the use of the CAST and ADA-CCS visual scoring systems. In addition, the reliability and accuracy of ADA-CCS index in permanent teeth were not studied yet. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the influence of different levels of optical magnification on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using three visual scoring systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One occlusal site per tooth was analyzed in 120 extracted permanent molars. Two trained examiners inspected the teeth using ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System), CAST (Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment), and ADA-CCS (American Dental Association-Caries Classification System) visual criteria, twice with each scoring system, with a one-week interval between examinations. The study was conducted in three phases: (A) without optical magnification, (B) using a binocular lens (3.5× magnification), and (C) using an operating microscope (16× magnification). Then, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally through the center of the selected site and the section with the more severe lesion was histological evaluated considering the D1 (lesions in enamel and dentin) and D3 (dentin lesions) thresholds. RESULTS: Kappa values for intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility were good to excellent for all systems. At the D1 threshold, sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve were high for ICDAS and CAST in all phases. However, this was not the case for the ADA-CCS in phase C (<0.05). At the D3 diagnostic threshold, there was no significant difference between the visual scoring systems during the study phases (>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The magnification does not improve the accuracy of the visual scoring systems in the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. Key words:Dental caries, caries detection, permanent teeth, visual examination, magnification. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263771/ /pubmed/32509231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56445 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wilde, Sabrina
Campos, Priscila-Hernández
Marcondes, Ana-Paula-Marçal
Moura-Netto, Cacio
Novaes, Tatiane-Fernandes
Lussi, Adrian
Diniz, Michele-Baffi
Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title_full Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title_short Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study
title_sort optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: an in vitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56445
work_keys_str_mv AT wildesabrina opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT campospriscilahernandez opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT marcondesanapaulamarcal opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT mouranettocacio opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT novaestatianefernandes opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT lussiadrian opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy
AT dinizmichelebaffi opticalmagnificationhasnobenefitsonthedetectionofocclusalcarieslesionsinpermanentmolarsusingdifferentvisualscoringsystemsaninvitrostudy