Cargando…

NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018

Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009–2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noble, Paige, Ten Eyck, Patrick, Roskoski, Robert, Jackson, J. Brooks
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367
_version_ 1783540866078474240
author Noble, Paige
Ten Eyck, Patrick
Roskoski, Robert
Jackson, J. Brooks
author_facet Noble, Paige
Ten Eyck, Patrick
Roskoski, Robert
Jackson, J. Brooks
author_sort Noble, Paige
collection PubMed
description Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009–2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009–2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7263845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72638452020-06-10 NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018 Noble, Paige Ten Eyck, Patrick Roskoski, Robert Jackson, J. Brooks PLoS One Research Article Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009–2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009–2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models. Public Library of Science 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263845/ /pubmed/32480400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367 Text en © 2020 Noble et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Noble, Paige
Ten Eyck, Patrick
Roskoski, Robert
Jackson, J. Brooks
NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title_full NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title_fullStr NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title_short NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018
title_sort nih funding trends to us medical schools from 2009 to 2018
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367
work_keys_str_mv AT noblepaige nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT teneyckpatrick nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT roskoskirobert nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT jacksonjbrooks nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018