Cargando…

The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula

PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Weili, Huang, Qinying, Chen, Yile, Li, Jinying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
_version_ 1783540866313355264
author Zhang, Weili
Huang, Qinying
Chen, Yile
Li, Jinying
author_facet Zhang, Weili
Huang, Qinying
Chen, Yile
Li, Jinying
author_sort Zhang, Weili
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron’s formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing–Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS: The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron’s formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Heron’s formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7263846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72638462020-06-10 The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula Zhang, Weili Huang, Qinying Chen, Yile Li, Jinying PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron’s formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing–Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS: The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron’s formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Heron’s formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity. Public Library of Science 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263846/ /pubmed/32480401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016 Text en © 2020 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Weili
Huang, Qinying
Chen, Yile
Li, Jinying
The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title_full The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title_fullStr The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title_short The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
title_sort feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple heron’s formula
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangweili thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT huangqinying thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT chenyile thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT lijinying thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT zhangweili feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT huangqinying feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT chenyile feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula
AT lijinying feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula