Cargando…
The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula
PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016 |
_version_ | 1783540866313355264 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Weili Huang, Qinying Chen, Yile Li, Jinying |
author_facet | Zhang, Weili Huang, Qinying Chen, Yile Li, Jinying |
author_sort | Zhang, Weili |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron’s formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing–Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS: The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron’s formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Heron’s formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7263846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72638462020-06-10 The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula Zhang, Weili Huang, Qinying Chen, Yile Li, Jinying PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. METHOD: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron’s formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing–Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. RESULTS: The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron’s formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Heron’s formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity. Public Library of Science 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263846/ /pubmed/32480401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016 Text en © 2020 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Weili Huang, Qinying Chen, Yile Li, Jinying The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title | The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title_full | The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title_fullStr | The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title_full_unstemmed | The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title_short | The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula |
title_sort | feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple heron’s formula |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangweili thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT huangqinying thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT chenyile thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT lijinying thefeasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT zhangweili feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT huangqinying feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT chenyile feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula AT lijinying feasibilityanalysisofcalculatingproptosisbysimpleheronsformula |