Cargando…

Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)

The creation of species-specific valid tools for pain assessment is essential to recognize pain and determine the requirement and efficacy of analgesic treatments. This study aimed to assess behaviour and investigate the validity and reliability of an acute pain scale in pigs undergoing orchiectomy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro, de Araújo, Ana Lucélia, da Nóbrega Neto, Pedro Isidro, Brondani, Juliana Tabarelli, de Oliveira, Flávia Augusta, Azerêdo, Liliane Marinho dos Santos, Telles, Felipe Garcia, Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233552
_version_ 1783540866557673472
author Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
de Araújo, Ana Lucélia
da Nóbrega Neto, Pedro Isidro
Brondani, Juliana Tabarelli
de Oliveira, Flávia Augusta
Azerêdo, Liliane Marinho dos Santos
Telles, Felipe Garcia
Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
author_facet Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
de Araújo, Ana Lucélia
da Nóbrega Neto, Pedro Isidro
Brondani, Juliana Tabarelli
de Oliveira, Flávia Augusta
Azerêdo, Liliane Marinho dos Santos
Telles, Felipe Garcia
Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
author_sort Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
collection PubMed
description The creation of species-specific valid tools for pain assessment is essential to recognize pain and determine the requirement and efficacy of analgesic treatments. This study aimed to assess behaviour and investigate the validity and reliability of an acute pain scale in pigs undergoing orchiectomy. Forty-five pigs aged 38±3 days were castrated under local anaesthesia. Behaviour was video-recorded 30 minutes before and intermittently up to 24 hours after castration. Edited footage (before surgery, after surgery before and after rescue analgesia, and 24 hours postoperatively) was analysed twice (one month apart) by one observer who was present during video-recording (in-person researcher) and three blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed using R software and differences were considered significant when p<0.05. Intra and inter-observer agreement, based on intra-class correlation coefficient, was good or very good between most observers (>0.60), except between observers 1 and 3 (moderate agreement 0.57). The scale was unidimensional according to principal component analysis. The scale showed acceptable item-total Spearman correlation, excellent predictive and concurrent criterion validity (Spearman correlation ≥ 0.85 between the proposed scale versus visual analogue, numerical rating, and simple descriptive scales), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient >0.80 for all items), responsiveness (the pain scores of all items of the scale increased after castration and decreased after intervention analgesia according to Friedman test), and specificity (> 95%). Sensitivity was good or excellent for most of the items. The optimal cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 6 of 18. Discriminatory ability was excellent for all observers according to the area under the curve (>0.95). The proposed scale is a reliable and valid instrument and may be used clinically and experimentally to assess postoperative acute pain in pigs. The well-defined cut-off point supports the evaluator´s decision to provide or not analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7263847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72638472020-06-10 Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS) Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro de Araújo, Ana Lucélia da Nóbrega Neto, Pedro Isidro Brondani, Juliana Tabarelli de Oliveira, Flávia Augusta Azerêdo, Liliane Marinho dos Santos Telles, Felipe Garcia Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves PLoS One Research Article The creation of species-specific valid tools for pain assessment is essential to recognize pain and determine the requirement and efficacy of analgesic treatments. This study aimed to assess behaviour and investigate the validity and reliability of an acute pain scale in pigs undergoing orchiectomy. Forty-five pigs aged 38±3 days were castrated under local anaesthesia. Behaviour was video-recorded 30 minutes before and intermittently up to 24 hours after castration. Edited footage (before surgery, after surgery before and after rescue analgesia, and 24 hours postoperatively) was analysed twice (one month apart) by one observer who was present during video-recording (in-person researcher) and three blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed using R software and differences were considered significant when p<0.05. Intra and inter-observer agreement, based on intra-class correlation coefficient, was good or very good between most observers (>0.60), except between observers 1 and 3 (moderate agreement 0.57). The scale was unidimensional according to principal component analysis. The scale showed acceptable item-total Spearman correlation, excellent predictive and concurrent criterion validity (Spearman correlation ≥ 0.85 between the proposed scale versus visual analogue, numerical rating, and simple descriptive scales), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient >0.80 for all items), responsiveness (the pain scores of all items of the scale increased after castration and decreased after intervention analgesia according to Friedman test), and specificity (> 95%). Sensitivity was good or excellent for most of the items. The optimal cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 6 of 18. Discriminatory ability was excellent for all observers according to the area under the curve (>0.95). The proposed scale is a reliable and valid instrument and may be used clinically and experimentally to assess postoperative acute pain in pigs. The well-defined cut-off point supports the evaluator´s decision to provide or not analgesia. Public Library of Science 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7263847/ /pubmed/32480399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233552 Text en © 2020 Luna et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
de Araújo, Ana Lucélia
da Nóbrega Neto, Pedro Isidro
Brondani, Juliana Tabarelli
de Oliveira, Flávia Augusta
Azerêdo, Liliane Marinho dos Santos
Telles, Felipe Garcia
Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title_full Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title_fullStr Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title_short Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS)
title_sort validation of the unesp-botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (upaps)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32480399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233552
work_keys_str_mv AT lunasteliopaccaloureiro validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT dearaujoanalucelia validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT danobreganetopedroisidro validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT brondanijulianatabarelli validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT deoliveiraflaviaaugusta validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT azeredolilianemarinhodossantos validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT tellesfelipegarcia validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps
AT trindadepedrohenriqueesteves validationoftheunespbotucatupigcompositeacutepainscaleupaps