Cargando…
A Predictive Scoring System Based on Inflammatory and Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Resection
PURPOSE: Inflammation is closely associated with prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to assess the predictive value of existing inflammatory and tumor markers in GC, to establish a systemic score based on valuable predictors for early risk stratification of patients, and to create a nomogram...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547229 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250408 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Inflammation is closely associated with prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to assess the predictive value of existing inflammatory and tumor markers in GC, to establish a systemic score based on valuable predictors for early risk stratification of patients, and to create a nomogram for individual risk prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 401 GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy from 2007 to 2016. RESULTS: Through univariate and multivariate survival analysis, age (>60 years), depth of invasion (pT3–4), lymph node invasion (pN1–3), histologic classification (poor), adjuvant chemotherapy (no), albumin fibrinogen ratio (AFR) (<13.33), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (>27 U/mL) independently indicated inferior disease-free survival (DFS). In addition, depth of invasion, lymph node invasion, histologic classification, adjuvant chemotherapy, AFR, and CA19-9 were incorporated in the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS). A combined AFR and CA19-9 prognostic score (CACPS) was established. Lower AFR (<13.33) and higher CA19-9 (>27 U/mL) were allocated 1 point each in the CACPS (range, 0–2). CACPS can be used as an independent predictor for DFS and CSS in multivariate analysis (for DFS: CACPS 1: HR=2.039, 95% CI: 1.357–3.065, P=0.001; CACPS 2: HR=2.419, 95% CI: 1.397–4.186, P=0.002; for CSS: CACPS 1: HR=2.035, 95% CI: 1.292–3.205, P=0.002; CACPS 2: HR=2.255, 95% CI: 1.252–4.059, P=0.007), with a higher CACPS indicating poor survival according to Kaplan–Meier curves (both P<0.001). Moreover, a nomogram for DFS and CSS was generated using the significant characteristics in the multivariate analysis, which exhibited high accuracy (for DFS: C-index=0.743, 95% CI: 0.698–0.788; for CSS: C-index=0.766, 95% CI: 0.718–0.814) versus tumor–node–metastasis staging (for DFS: C-index=0.692, 95% CI: 0.650–0.734; for CSS: C-index=0.720, 95% CI: 0.675–0.764). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CACPS exhibited high accuracy in predicting prognosis for GC patients who underwent curative resection. |
---|