Cargando…

Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Ensuring efficient use and allocation of limited resources is crucial to achieving the UHC goal. Performance-based financing that provides financial incentives for health providers reaching predefined targets would be expected to enhance technical efficiency across facilities by promotin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binyaruka, Peter, Anselmi, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002326
_version_ 1783540989860773888
author Binyaruka, Peter
Anselmi, Laura
author_facet Binyaruka, Peter
Anselmi, Laura
author_sort Binyaruka, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ensuring efficient use and allocation of limited resources is crucial to achieving the UHC goal. Performance-based financing that provides financial incentives for health providers reaching predefined targets would be expected to enhance technical efficiency across facilities by promoting an output-oriented payment system. However, there is no study which has systematically assessed efficiency scores across facilities before and after the introduction of pay-for-performance (P4P). This paper seeks to fill this knowledge gap. METHODS: We used data of P4P evaluation related to healthcare inputs (staff, equipment, medicines) and outputs (outpatient consultations and institutional deliveries) from 75 health facilities implementing P4P in Pwani region, and 75 from comparison districts in Tanzania. We measured technical efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis and obtained efficiency scores across facilities before and after P4P scheme. We analysed which factors influence technical efficiency by regressing the efficiency scores over a number of contextual factors. We also tested the impact of P4P on efficiency through a difference-in-differences regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall technical efficiency scores ranged between 0.40 and 0.65 for hospitals and health centres, and around 0.20 for dispensaries. Only 21% of hospitals and health centres were efficient when outpatient consultations and deliveries were considered as output, and <3% out of all facilities were efficient when outpatient consultations only were considered as outputs. Higher efficiency scores were significantly associated with the level of care (hospital and health centre) and wealthier catchment populations. Despite no evidence of P4P effect on efficiency on average, P4P might have improved efficiency marginally among public facilities. CONCLUSION: Most facilities were not operating at their full capacity indicating potential for improving resource usage. A better understanding of the production process at the facility level and of how different healthcare financing reforms affects efficiency is needed. Effective reforms should improve inputs, outputs but also efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7264634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72646342020-06-12 Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania Binyaruka, Peter Anselmi, Laura BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Ensuring efficient use and allocation of limited resources is crucial to achieving the UHC goal. Performance-based financing that provides financial incentives for health providers reaching predefined targets would be expected to enhance technical efficiency across facilities by promoting an output-oriented payment system. However, there is no study which has systematically assessed efficiency scores across facilities before and after the introduction of pay-for-performance (P4P). This paper seeks to fill this knowledge gap. METHODS: We used data of P4P evaluation related to healthcare inputs (staff, equipment, medicines) and outputs (outpatient consultations and institutional deliveries) from 75 health facilities implementing P4P in Pwani region, and 75 from comparison districts in Tanzania. We measured technical efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis and obtained efficiency scores across facilities before and after P4P scheme. We analysed which factors influence technical efficiency by regressing the efficiency scores over a number of contextual factors. We also tested the impact of P4P on efficiency through a difference-in-differences regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall technical efficiency scores ranged between 0.40 and 0.65 for hospitals and health centres, and around 0.20 for dispensaries. Only 21% of hospitals and health centres were efficient when outpatient consultations and deliveries were considered as output, and <3% out of all facilities were efficient when outpatient consultations only were considered as outputs. Higher efficiency scores were significantly associated with the level of care (hospital and health centre) and wealthier catchment populations. Despite no evidence of P4P effect on efficiency on average, P4P might have improved efficiency marginally among public facilities. CONCLUSION: Most facilities were not operating at their full capacity indicating potential for improving resource usage. A better understanding of the production process at the facility level and of how different healthcare financing reforms affects efficiency is needed. Effective reforms should improve inputs, outputs but also efficiency. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7264634/ /pubmed/32474421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002326 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Binyaruka, Peter
Anselmi, Laura
Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title_full Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title_fullStr Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title_short Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania
title_sort understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in tanzania
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002326
work_keys_str_mv AT binyarukapeter understandingefficiencyandtheeffectofpayforperformanceacrosshealthfacilitiesintanzania
AT anselmilaura understandingefficiencyandtheeffectofpayforperformanceacrosshealthfacilitiesintanzania