Cargando…

Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy

Visual processing of other’s actions is supported by sensorimotor brain activations. Access to sensorimotor representations may, in principle, provide the top-down signal required to bias search and selection of critical visual features. For this to happen, it is necessary that a stable one-to-one m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilt, P M, Cardellicchio, P, Dolfini, E, Pozzo, T, Fadiga, L, D’Ausilio, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa006
_version_ 1783540996046323712
author Hilt, P M
Cardellicchio, P
Dolfini, E
Pozzo, T
Fadiga, L
D’Ausilio, A
author_facet Hilt, P M
Cardellicchio, P
Dolfini, E
Pozzo, T
Fadiga, L
D’Ausilio, A
author_sort Hilt, P M
collection PubMed
description Visual processing of other’s actions is supported by sensorimotor brain activations. Access to sensorimotor representations may, in principle, provide the top-down signal required to bias search and selection of critical visual features. For this to happen, it is necessary that a stable one-to-one mapping exists between observed kinematics and underlying motor commands. However, due to the inherent redundancy of the human musculoskeletal system, this is hardly the case for multijoint actions where everyone has his own moving style (individual motor signature—IMS). Here, we investigated the influence of subject’s IMS on subjects’ motor excitability during the observation of an actor achieving the same goal by adopting two different IMSs. Despite a clear dissociation in kinematic and electromyographic patterns between the two actions, we found no group-level modulation of corticospinal excitability (CSE) in observers. Rather, we found a negative relationship between CSE and actor-observer IMS distance, already at the single-subject level. Thus, sensorimotor activity during action observation does not slavishly replicate the motor plan implemented by the actor, but rather reflects the distance between what is canonical according to one’s own motor template and the observed movements performed by other individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7264692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72646922020-06-09 Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy Hilt, P M Cardellicchio, P Dolfini, E Pozzo, T Fadiga, L D’Ausilio, A Cereb Cortex Original Article Visual processing of other’s actions is supported by sensorimotor brain activations. Access to sensorimotor representations may, in principle, provide the top-down signal required to bias search and selection of critical visual features. For this to happen, it is necessary that a stable one-to-one mapping exists between observed kinematics and underlying motor commands. However, due to the inherent redundancy of the human musculoskeletal system, this is hardly the case for multijoint actions where everyone has his own moving style (individual motor signature—IMS). Here, we investigated the influence of subject’s IMS on subjects’ motor excitability during the observation of an actor achieving the same goal by adopting two different IMSs. Despite a clear dissociation in kinematic and electromyographic patterns between the two actions, we found no group-level modulation of corticospinal excitability (CSE) in observers. Rather, we found a negative relationship between CSE and actor-observer IMS distance, already at the single-subject level. Thus, sensorimotor activity during action observation does not slavishly replicate the motor plan implemented by the actor, but rather reflects the distance between what is canonical according to one’s own motor template and the observed movements performed by other individuals. Oxford University Press 2020-06 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7264692/ /pubmed/32043124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa006 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Hilt, P M
Cardellicchio, P
Dolfini, E
Pozzo, T
Fadiga, L
D’Ausilio, A
Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title_full Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title_fullStr Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title_short Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy
title_sort motor recruitment during action observation: effect of interindividual differences in action strategy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa006
work_keys_str_mv AT hiltpm motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy
AT cardellicchiop motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy
AT dolfinie motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy
AT pozzot motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy
AT fadigal motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy
AT dausilioa motorrecruitmentduringactionobservationeffectofinterindividualdifferencesinactionstrategy