Cargando…

Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hörberg, Thomas, Larsson, Maria, Ekström, Ingrid, Sandöy, Camilla, Lundén, Peter, Olofsson, Jonas K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050
_version_ 1783540996279107584
author Hörberg, Thomas
Larsson, Maria
Ekström, Ingrid
Sandöy, Camilla
Lundén, Peter
Olofsson, Jonas K
author_facet Hörberg, Thomas
Larsson, Maria
Ekström, Ingrid
Sandöy, Camilla
Lundén, Peter
Olofsson, Jonas K
author_sort Hörberg, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimulus pairs. We tested this assumption by comparing visual processing with olfaction, a “primitive” sensory channel that detects potentially hazardous chemicals by alerting attention. Behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed in a bimodal object categorization task with congruent or incongruent odor–picture pairings and a delayed auditory target that indicated whether olfactory or visual cues should be categorized. For congruent pairings, accuracy was higher for visual compared to olfactory decisions. However, for incongruent pairings, reaction times (RTs) were faster for olfactory decisions. Behavioral results suggested that incongruent odors interfered more with visual decisions, thereby providing evidence for an “olfactory dominance” effect. Categorization of incongruent pairings engendered a late “slow wave” ERP effect. Importantly, this effect had a later amplitude peak and longer latency during visual decisions, likely reflecting additional categorization effort for visual stimuli in the presence of incongruent odors. In sum, contrary to what might be inferred from theories of “visual dominance,” incongruent odors may in fact uniquely attract mental processing resources during perceptual incongruence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7264693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72646932020-06-09 Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence Hörberg, Thomas Larsson, Maria Ekström, Ingrid Sandöy, Camilla Lundén, Peter Olofsson, Jonas K Cereb Cortex Original Article Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimulus pairs. We tested this assumption by comparing visual processing with olfaction, a “primitive” sensory channel that detects potentially hazardous chemicals by alerting attention. Behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed in a bimodal object categorization task with congruent or incongruent odor–picture pairings and a delayed auditory target that indicated whether olfactory or visual cues should be categorized. For congruent pairings, accuracy was higher for visual compared to olfactory decisions. However, for incongruent pairings, reaction times (RTs) were faster for olfactory decisions. Behavioral results suggested that incongruent odors interfered more with visual decisions, thereby providing evidence for an “olfactory dominance” effect. Categorization of incongruent pairings engendered a late “slow wave” ERP effect. Importantly, this effect had a later amplitude peak and longer latency during visual decisions, likely reflecting additional categorization effort for visual stimuli in the presence of incongruent odors. In sum, contrary to what might be inferred from theories of “visual dominance,” incongruent odors may in fact uniquely attract mental processing resources during perceptual incongruence. Oxford University Press 2020-06 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7264693/ /pubmed/32232368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hörberg, Thomas
Larsson, Maria
Ekström, Ingrid
Sandöy, Camilla
Lundén, Peter
Olofsson, Jonas K
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title_full Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title_fullStr Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title_short Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
title_sort olfactory influences on visual categorization: behavioral and erp evidence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050
work_keys_str_mv AT horbergthomas olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence
AT larssonmaria olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence
AT ekstromingrid olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence
AT sandoycamilla olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence
AT lundenpeter olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence
AT olofssonjonask olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence