Cargando…
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence
Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050 |
_version_ | 1783540996279107584 |
---|---|
author | Hörberg, Thomas Larsson, Maria Ekström, Ingrid Sandöy, Camilla Lundén, Peter Olofsson, Jonas K |
author_facet | Hörberg, Thomas Larsson, Maria Ekström, Ingrid Sandöy, Camilla Lundén, Peter Olofsson, Jonas K |
author_sort | Hörberg, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimulus pairs. We tested this assumption by comparing visual processing with olfaction, a “primitive” sensory channel that detects potentially hazardous chemicals by alerting attention. Behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed in a bimodal object categorization task with congruent or incongruent odor–picture pairings and a delayed auditory target that indicated whether olfactory or visual cues should be categorized. For congruent pairings, accuracy was higher for visual compared to olfactory decisions. However, for incongruent pairings, reaction times (RTs) were faster for olfactory decisions. Behavioral results suggested that incongruent odors interfered more with visual decisions, thereby providing evidence for an “olfactory dominance” effect. Categorization of incongruent pairings engendered a late “slow wave” ERP effect. Importantly, this effect had a later amplitude peak and longer latency during visual decisions, likely reflecting additional categorization effort for visual stimuli in the presence of incongruent odors. In sum, contrary to what might be inferred from theories of “visual dominance,” incongruent odors may in fact uniquely attract mental processing resources during perceptual incongruence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7264693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72646932020-06-09 Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence Hörberg, Thomas Larsson, Maria Ekström, Ingrid Sandöy, Camilla Lundén, Peter Olofsson, Jonas K Cereb Cortex Original Article Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimulus pairs. We tested this assumption by comparing visual processing with olfaction, a “primitive” sensory channel that detects potentially hazardous chemicals by alerting attention. Behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed in a bimodal object categorization task with congruent or incongruent odor–picture pairings and a delayed auditory target that indicated whether olfactory or visual cues should be categorized. For congruent pairings, accuracy was higher for visual compared to olfactory decisions. However, for incongruent pairings, reaction times (RTs) were faster for olfactory decisions. Behavioral results suggested that incongruent odors interfered more with visual decisions, thereby providing evidence for an “olfactory dominance” effect. Categorization of incongruent pairings engendered a late “slow wave” ERP effect. Importantly, this effect had a later amplitude peak and longer latency during visual decisions, likely reflecting additional categorization effort for visual stimuli in the presence of incongruent odors. In sum, contrary to what might be inferred from theories of “visual dominance,” incongruent odors may in fact uniquely attract mental processing resources during perceptual incongruence. Oxford University Press 2020-06 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7264693/ /pubmed/32232368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hörberg, Thomas Larsson, Maria Ekström, Ingrid Sandöy, Camilla Lundén, Peter Olofsson, Jonas K Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title | Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title_full | Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title_fullStr | Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title_short | Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence |
title_sort | olfactory influences on visual categorization: behavioral and erp evidence |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horbergthomas olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence AT larssonmaria olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence AT ekstromingrid olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence AT sandoycamilla olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence AT lundenpeter olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence AT olofssonjonask olfactoryinfluencesonvisualcategorizationbehavioralanderpevidence |