Cargando…
Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications
BACKGROUND: The Brain Injury Guidelines provide an algorithm fortreating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) that does not mandate hospital admission, repeat head CT, orneurosurgical consult for all patients. The purposes of this study are toreview the guideli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000483 |
_version_ | 1783541011375456256 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Abid D Elseth, Anna J Brosius, Jacqueline A Moskowitz, Eliza Liebscher, Sean C Anstadt, Michael J Dunn, Julie A McVicker, John H Schroeppel, Thomas Gonzalez, Richard P |
author_facet | Khan, Abid D Elseth, Anna J Brosius, Jacqueline A Moskowitz, Eliza Liebscher, Sean C Anstadt, Michael J Dunn, Julie A McVicker, John H Schroeppel, Thomas Gonzalez, Richard P |
author_sort | Khan, Abid D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Brain Injury Guidelines provide an algorithm fortreating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) that does not mandate hospital admission, repeat head CT, orneurosurgical consult for all patients. The purposes of this study are toreview the guidelines’ safety, to assess resource utilization, and to proposeguideline modifications that improve patient safety and widespreadreproducibility. METHODS: A multi-institutional review of TBI patients was conducted. Patients with ICH on CT were classified as BIG 1, 2, or 3 based on the guidelines. BIG 3 patients were excluded. Variables collected included demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, number of head CTs, type of injury, progression of injury, and neurosurgical interventions performed. RESULTS: 269 patients met inclusion criteria. 98 were classifiedas BIG 1 and 171 as BIG 2. The median length of stay (LOS) was 2 (2,4)days and the ICU LOS was 1 (0,2) days. Most patients had a neurosurgeryconsultation (95.9%) and all patients included had a repeat head CT. 370repeat head CT scans were performed, representing 1.38 repeat scans perpatient. 11.2% of BIG 1 and 11.1% of BIG 2 patients demonstratedworsening on repeat head CT. Patients who progressed exhibited a higherISS (14 vs. 10, p=0.040), and had a longer length of stay (4 vs. 2 days;p=0.015). After adjusting for other variables, the presence of epiduralhematoma (EDH) and intraparenchymal hematoma were independent predictors ofprogression. Two BIG 2 patients with EDH had clinical deteriorationrequiring intervention. DISCUSSION: The Brain Injury Guidelines may improve resourceallocation if utilized, but alterations are required to ensure patientsafety. The modified Brain Injury Guidelines refine the originalguidelines to enhance reproducibility and patient safety while continuing toprovide improved resource utilization in TBI management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7264829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72648292020-06-12 Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications Khan, Abid D Elseth, Anna J Brosius, Jacqueline A Moskowitz, Eliza Liebscher, Sean C Anstadt, Michael J Dunn, Julie A McVicker, John H Schroeppel, Thomas Gonzalez, Richard P Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The Brain Injury Guidelines provide an algorithm fortreating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) that does not mandate hospital admission, repeat head CT, orneurosurgical consult for all patients. The purposes of this study are toreview the guidelines’ safety, to assess resource utilization, and to proposeguideline modifications that improve patient safety and widespreadreproducibility. METHODS: A multi-institutional review of TBI patients was conducted. Patients with ICH on CT were classified as BIG 1, 2, or 3 based on the guidelines. BIG 3 patients were excluded. Variables collected included demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, number of head CTs, type of injury, progression of injury, and neurosurgical interventions performed. RESULTS: 269 patients met inclusion criteria. 98 were classifiedas BIG 1 and 171 as BIG 2. The median length of stay (LOS) was 2 (2,4)days and the ICU LOS was 1 (0,2) days. Most patients had a neurosurgeryconsultation (95.9%) and all patients included had a repeat head CT. 370repeat head CT scans were performed, representing 1.38 repeat scans perpatient. 11.2% of BIG 1 and 11.1% of BIG 2 patients demonstratedworsening on repeat head CT. Patients who progressed exhibited a higherISS (14 vs. 10, p=0.040), and had a longer length of stay (4 vs. 2 days;p=0.015). After adjusting for other variables, the presence of epiduralhematoma (EDH) and intraparenchymal hematoma were independent predictors ofprogression. Two BIG 2 patients with EDH had clinical deteriorationrequiring intervention. DISCUSSION: The Brain Injury Guidelines may improve resourceallocation if utilized, but alterations are required to ensure patientsafety. The modified Brain Injury Guidelines refine the originalguidelines to enhance reproducibility and patient safety while continuing toprovide improved resource utilization in TBI management. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7264829/ /pubmed/32537518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000483 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Khan, Abid D Elseth, Anna J Brosius, Jacqueline A Moskowitz, Eliza Liebscher, Sean C Anstadt, Michael J Dunn, Julie A McVicker, John H Schroeppel, Thomas Gonzalez, Richard P Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title | Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title_full | Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title_fullStr | Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title_short | Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
title_sort | multicenter assessment of the brain injury guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanabidd multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT elsethannaj multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT brosiusjacquelinea multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT moskowitzeliza multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT liebscherseanc multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT anstadtmichaelj multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT dunnjuliea multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT mcvickerjohnh multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT schroeppelthomas multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications AT gonzalezrichardp multicenterassessmentofthebraininjuryguidelinesandaproposalofguidelinemodifications |