Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

IMPORTANCE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) among asymptomatic patients involves a trade-off between a higher short-term perioperative risk in exchange for a lower long-term risk of stroke. The clinical benefit observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not extend to real-world practice. OBJECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keyhani, Salomeh, Cheng, Eric M., Hoggatt, Katherine J., Austin, Peter C., Madden, Erin, Hebert, Paul L., Halm, Ethan A., Naseri, Ayman, Johanning, Jason M., Mowery, Danielle, Chapman, Wendy W., Bravata, Dawn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1427
_version_ 1783541070894727168
author Keyhani, Salomeh
Cheng, Eric M.
Hoggatt, Katherine J.
Austin, Peter C.
Madden, Erin
Hebert, Paul L.
Halm, Ethan A.
Naseri, Ayman
Johanning, Jason M.
Mowery, Danielle
Chapman, Wendy W.
Bravata, Dawn M.
author_facet Keyhani, Salomeh
Cheng, Eric M.
Hoggatt, Katherine J.
Austin, Peter C.
Madden, Erin
Hebert, Paul L.
Halm, Ethan A.
Naseri, Ayman
Johanning, Jason M.
Mowery, Danielle
Chapman, Wendy W.
Bravata, Dawn M.
author_sort Keyhani, Salomeh
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) among asymptomatic patients involves a trade-off between a higher short-term perioperative risk in exchange for a lower long-term risk of stroke. The clinical benefit observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not extend to real-world practice. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether early intervention (CEA) was superior to initial medical therapy in real-world practice in preventing fatal and nonfatal strokes among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness study was conducted from August 28, 2018, to March 2, 2020, using the Corporate Data Warehouse, Suicide Data Repository, and other databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Data analyzed were those of veterans of the US Armed Forces aged 65 years or older who received carotid imaging between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Patients without a carotid imaging report, those with carotid stenosis of less than 50% or hemodynamically insignificant stenosis, and those with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the 6 months before index imaging were excluded. A cohort of patients who received initial medical therapy and a cohort of similar patients who received CEA were constructed and followed up for 5 years. The target trial method was used to compute weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and estimate the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes in each cohort in the pragmatic sample across 5 years of follow-up. This analysis was repeated after restricting the sample to patients who met RCT inclusion criteria. Cumulative incidence functions for fatal and nonfatal strokes were estimated, accounting for nonstroke deaths as competing risks in both the pragmatic and RCT-like samples. EXPOSURES: Receipt of CEA vs initial medical therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Fatal and nonfatal strokes. RESULTS: Of the total 5221 patients, 2712 (51.9%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2678 men [98.8%]) received CEA and 2509 (48.1%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2479 men [98.8%]) received initial medical therapy within 1 year after the index carotid imaging. The observed rate of stroke or death (perioperative complications) within 30 days in the CEA cohort was 2.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.1%). The 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was lower among patients randomized to CEA compared with patients randomized to initial medical therapy (5.6% vs 7.8%; risk difference, −2.3%; 95% CI, −4.0% to −0.3%). In an analysis that incorporated the competing risk of death, the risk difference between the 2 cohorts was lower and not statistically significant (risk difference, −0.8%; 95% CI, −2.1% to 0.5%). Among patients who met RCT inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.5%-6.5%) among patients randomized to CEA and was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.5%) among those randomized to initial medical therapy (risk difference, −2.1%; 95% CI, −4.4% to −0.2%). Accounting for competing risks resulted in a risk difference of −0.9% (95% CI, −2.9% to 0.7%) that was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the absolute reduction in the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes associated with early CEA was less than half the risk difference in trials from 20 years ago and was no longer statistically significant when the competing risk of nonstroke deaths was accounted for in the analysis. Given the nonnegligible perioperative 30-day risks and the improvements in stroke prevention, medical therapy may be an acceptable therapeutic strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7265126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72651262020-06-15 Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Keyhani, Salomeh Cheng, Eric M. Hoggatt, Katherine J. Austin, Peter C. Madden, Erin Hebert, Paul L. Halm, Ethan A. Naseri, Ayman Johanning, Jason M. Mowery, Danielle Chapman, Wendy W. Bravata, Dawn M. JAMA Neurol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) among asymptomatic patients involves a trade-off between a higher short-term perioperative risk in exchange for a lower long-term risk of stroke. The clinical benefit observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not extend to real-world practice. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether early intervention (CEA) was superior to initial medical therapy in real-world practice in preventing fatal and nonfatal strokes among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness study was conducted from August 28, 2018, to March 2, 2020, using the Corporate Data Warehouse, Suicide Data Repository, and other databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Data analyzed were those of veterans of the US Armed Forces aged 65 years or older who received carotid imaging between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Patients without a carotid imaging report, those with carotid stenosis of less than 50% or hemodynamically insignificant stenosis, and those with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the 6 months before index imaging were excluded. A cohort of patients who received initial medical therapy and a cohort of similar patients who received CEA were constructed and followed up for 5 years. The target trial method was used to compute weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and estimate the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes in each cohort in the pragmatic sample across 5 years of follow-up. This analysis was repeated after restricting the sample to patients who met RCT inclusion criteria. Cumulative incidence functions for fatal and nonfatal strokes were estimated, accounting for nonstroke deaths as competing risks in both the pragmatic and RCT-like samples. EXPOSURES: Receipt of CEA vs initial medical therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Fatal and nonfatal strokes. RESULTS: Of the total 5221 patients, 2712 (51.9%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2678 men [98.8%]) received CEA and 2509 (48.1%; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 2479 men [98.8%]) received initial medical therapy within 1 year after the index carotid imaging. The observed rate of stroke or death (perioperative complications) within 30 days in the CEA cohort was 2.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.1%). The 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was lower among patients randomized to CEA compared with patients randomized to initial medical therapy (5.6% vs 7.8%; risk difference, −2.3%; 95% CI, −4.0% to −0.3%). In an analysis that incorporated the competing risk of death, the risk difference between the 2 cohorts was lower and not statistically significant (risk difference, −0.8%; 95% CI, −2.1% to 0.5%). Among patients who met RCT inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.5%-6.5%) among patients randomized to CEA and was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.5%) among those randomized to initial medical therapy (risk difference, −2.1%; 95% CI, −4.4% to −0.2%). Accounting for competing risks resulted in a risk difference of −0.9% (95% CI, −2.9% to 0.7%) that was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the absolute reduction in the risk of fatal and nonfatal strokes associated with early CEA was less than half the risk difference in trials from 20 years ago and was no longer statistically significant when the competing risk of nonstroke deaths was accounted for in the analysis. Given the nonnegligible perioperative 30-day risks and the improvements in stroke prevention, medical therapy may be an acceptable therapeutic strategy. American Medical Association 2020-09 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7265126/ /pubmed/32478802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1427 Text en Copyright 2020 Keyhani S et al. JAMA Neurology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Keyhani, Salomeh
Cheng, Eric M.
Hoggatt, Katherine J.
Austin, Peter C.
Madden, Erin
Hebert, Paul L.
Halm, Ethan A.
Naseri, Ayman
Johanning, Jason M.
Mowery, Danielle
Chapman, Wendy W.
Bravata, Dawn M.
Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy vs initial medical therapy in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1427
work_keys_str_mv AT keyhanisalomeh comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT chengericm comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT hoggattkatherinej comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT austinpeterc comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT maddenerin comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT hebertpaull comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT halmethana comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT naseriayman comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT johanningjasonm comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT mowerydanielle comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT chapmanwendyw comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT bravatadawnm comparativeeffectivenessofcarotidendarterectomyvsinitialmedicaltherapyinpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidstenosis