Cargando…

Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction

PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Helen, Sanders, Emi, Rocha, Guillermo, Bhamra, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32510021
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20
_version_ 1783541098086400000
author Chung, Helen
Sanders, Emi
Rocha, Guillermo
Bhamra, Jamie
author_facet Chung, Helen
Sanders, Emi
Rocha, Guillermo
Bhamra, Jamie
author_sort Chung, Helen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS) with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction. RESULTS: There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%) would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7265273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72652732020-06-04 Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction Chung, Helen Sanders, Emi Rocha, Guillermo Bhamra, Jamie J Curr Ophthalmol Brief Report PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS) with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction. RESULTS: There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%) would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7265273/ /pubmed/32510021 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Current Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Chung, Helen
Sanders, Emi
Rocha, Guillermo
Bhamra, Jamie
Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title_full Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title_fullStr Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title_full_unstemmed Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title_short Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
title_sort canadian opinions on refractive surgery and approaches to presbyopia correction
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32510021
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20
work_keys_str_mv AT chunghelen canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection
AT sandersemi canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection
AT rochaguillermo canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection
AT bhamrajamie canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection