Cargando…
Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction
PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), le...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32510021 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20 |
_version_ | 1783541098086400000 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Helen Sanders, Emi Rocha, Guillermo Bhamra, Jamie |
author_facet | Chung, Helen Sanders, Emi Rocha, Guillermo Bhamra, Jamie |
author_sort | Chung, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS) with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction. RESULTS: There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%) would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7265273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72652732020-06-04 Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction Chung, Helen Sanders, Emi Rocha, Guillermo Bhamra, Jamie J Curr Ophthalmol Brief Report PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS) with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction. RESULTS: There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%) would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7265273/ /pubmed/32510021 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Current Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Chung, Helen Sanders, Emi Rocha, Guillermo Bhamra, Jamie Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title | Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title_full | Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title_fullStr | Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title_full_unstemmed | Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title_short | Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction |
title_sort | canadian opinions on refractive surgery and approaches to presbyopia correction |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32510021 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_50_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chunghelen canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection AT sandersemi canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection AT rochaguillermo canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection AT bhamrajamie canadianopinionsonrefractivesurgeryandapproachestopresbyopiacorrection |