Cargando…

Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate facial profile changes promoted by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement graft to reduce excessive gingival display due to hyperactivity of the elevator muscles of the upper lip during smiling. METHODS: Eleven patients (all females, age range: 20 to 43 years) presenting gingiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Torres, Érica Miranda, Valladares-Neto, José, Bernades, Karina de Oliveira, Naldi, Luis Fernando, de Torres, Hianne Miranda, Carvalho, Alexandre Leite, Estrela, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.044-051.oar
_version_ 1783541172128448512
author de Torres, Érica Miranda
Valladares-Neto, José
Bernades, Karina de Oliveira
Naldi, Luis Fernando
de Torres, Hianne Miranda
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
Estrela, Carlos
author_facet de Torres, Érica Miranda
Valladares-Neto, José
Bernades, Karina de Oliveira
Naldi, Luis Fernando
de Torres, Hianne Miranda
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
Estrela, Carlos
author_sort de Torres, Érica Miranda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate facial profile changes promoted by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement graft to reduce excessive gingival display due to hyperactivity of the elevator muscles of the upper lip during smiling. METHODS: Eleven patients (all females, age range: 20 to 43 years) presenting gingival smile that were treated with PMMA cement grafts in a private clinic were selected for this retrospective study. Three angular and ten linear cephalometric facial profile measurements were performed preoperatively (baseline, T(1)) and at least 6 months postoperatively (T(2)). Differences between T(1) and T(2) were verified by Wilcoxon test, and the correlation between the thickness of the graft and facial profile changes was statistically evaluated by Spearman’s Coefficient test. The significance level was set at p< 0.05. RESULTS: The nasolabial angle (p= 0.03) and the labial component of the nasolabial angle showed statistically significant differences (p= 0.04), with higher values in T(2). No correlations were found between the graft thickness and the statistically significant facial profile changes (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PMMA bone cement graft projected the upper lip forward, thereby increasing the nasolabial angle without affecting the nasal component. No correlations between the graft thickness and the facial profile changes were detected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7265667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72656672020-06-10 Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile de Torres, Érica Miranda Valladares-Neto, José Bernades, Karina de Oliveira Naldi, Luis Fernando de Torres, Hianne Miranda Carvalho, Alexandre Leite Estrela, Carlos Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate facial profile changes promoted by polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement graft to reduce excessive gingival display due to hyperactivity of the elevator muscles of the upper lip during smiling. METHODS: Eleven patients (all females, age range: 20 to 43 years) presenting gingival smile that were treated with PMMA cement grafts in a private clinic were selected for this retrospective study. Three angular and ten linear cephalometric facial profile measurements were performed preoperatively (baseline, T(1)) and at least 6 months postoperatively (T(2)). Differences between T(1) and T(2) were verified by Wilcoxon test, and the correlation between the thickness of the graft and facial profile changes was statistically evaluated by Spearman’s Coefficient test. The significance level was set at p< 0.05. RESULTS: The nasolabial angle (p= 0.03) and the labial component of the nasolabial angle showed statistically significant differences (p= 0.04), with higher values in T(2). No correlations were found between the graft thickness and the statistically significant facial profile changes (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PMMA bone cement graft projected the upper lip forward, thereby increasing the nasolabial angle without affecting the nasal component. No correlations between the graft thickness and the facial profile changes were detected. Dental Press International 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7265667/ /pubmed/32490926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.044-051.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
de Torres, Érica Miranda
Valladares-Neto, José
Bernades, Karina de Oliveira
Naldi, Luis Fernando
de Torres, Hianne Miranda
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
Estrela, Carlos
Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title_full Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title_fullStr Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title_full_unstemmed Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title_short Facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
title_sort facial profile changes due to bone cement graft to manage the hyperactive muscles of the gingival smile
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.044-051.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT detorresericamiranda facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT valladaresnetojose facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT bernadeskarinadeoliveira facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT naldiluisfernando facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT detorreshiannemiranda facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT carvalhoalexandreleite facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile
AT estrelacarlos facialprofilechangesduetobonecementgrafttomanagethehyperactivemusclesofthegingivalsmile