Cargando…
Effects of the cervical headgear in growing Angle Class II malocclusion patients: a prospective study
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate dental and skeletal changes resulting from the exclusive use of the cervical headgear for 15 ± 4 months in the treatment of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. METHODS: Differences between the beginning (T(1)) and immediately after the end of the therapy (T(2)) with t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.025-031.oar |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: Evaluate dental and skeletal changes resulting from the exclusive use of the cervical headgear for 15 ± 4 months in the treatment of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. METHODS: Differences between the beginning (T(1)) and immediately after the end of the therapy (T(2)) with the cervical headgear in growing patients (Experimental Group, EG, n = 23) were examined and compared, during compatible periods, with those presented by a group of untreated individuals (Control Group, CG, n =22) with similar malocclusions and chronological age. The cephalometric variables evaluated were: ANB, GoGn.SN, AO-BO, S'-ANS, S'-A, S'-B, S'-Pog and S'-U6 (maxillary first molar). The Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests were used to evaluate the results. RESULTS: Significant differences were found relative to the ANB, S'-U6, AO-BO, S'-ANS, S'-A, S'-B and S'-Pog variables between T(1) and T(2) when comparing both groups. No statistically significant variation was found regarding the GoGn.SN angle. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cervical headgear promoted distal movement of the maxillary first molars and restricted the anterior displacement of the maxilla, without significantly affecting the GoGn.SN angle. |
---|