Cargando…
Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultraso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19 |
_version_ | 1783541266752995328 |
---|---|
author | Monika, K. Sunkala, Lokesh Sandeep, N. Keerthi, K. Bharathi, B. Vimal Madhav, Gajula Venu |
author_facet | Monika, K. Sunkala, Lokesh Sandeep, N. Keerthi, K. Bharathi, B. Vimal Madhav, Gajula Venu |
author_sort | Monika, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultrasonic scaling and root planning with hand instruments and curettes. Patient is motivated for home care. The buccal fat pad is harvested and sutured in the gingival recession area and followed up for 6 months and root coverage was calculated. RESULTS: At baseline mean recession of 5.60 ± 1.18 mm, probing depth of 0.73 ± 0.59 mm, clinical attachment loss of 6.40 ± 1.18 mm were recorded. At the end of 6 months, the mean recession was reduced from 5.60 ± 1.18 mm to 2.87 ± 0.74 mm, probing depth was increased from 0.73 ± 0.59 mm to 1.73 ± 0.70 mm and clinical attachment loss was decreased from 6.40 ± 1.18 mm to 4.53 ± 0.83 mm.The difference between baseline score and six months score for all three parameters are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Buccal fat pad is a predictable procedure to cover Miller's class III and class IV gingival recession defects. There was a definitive improvement in clinical parameters (reduction in gingival recession, increased probing depth, gain in clinical attachment) after 6 months. There was 46.78% improvement in root coverage which was statistically significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7266237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72662372020-06-04 Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects Monika, K. Sunkala, Lokesh Sandeep, N. Keerthi, K. Bharathi, B. Vimal Madhav, Gajula Venu J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultrasonic scaling and root planning with hand instruments and curettes. Patient is motivated for home care. The buccal fat pad is harvested and sutured in the gingival recession area and followed up for 6 months and root coverage was calculated. RESULTS: At baseline mean recession of 5.60 ± 1.18 mm, probing depth of 0.73 ± 0.59 mm, clinical attachment loss of 6.40 ± 1.18 mm were recorded. At the end of 6 months, the mean recession was reduced from 5.60 ± 1.18 mm to 2.87 ± 0.74 mm, probing depth was increased from 0.73 ± 0.59 mm to 1.73 ± 0.70 mm and clinical attachment loss was decreased from 6.40 ± 1.18 mm to 4.53 ± 0.83 mm.The difference between baseline score and six months score for all three parameters are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Buccal fat pad is a predictable procedure to cover Miller's class III and class IV gingival recession defects. There was a definitive improvement in clinical parameters (reduction in gingival recession, increased probing depth, gain in clinical attachment) after 6 months. There was 46.78% improvement in root coverage which was statistically significant. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7266237/ /pubmed/32509667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Monika, K. Sunkala, Lokesh Sandeep, N. Keerthi, K. Bharathi, B. Vimal Madhav, Gajula Venu Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title | Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title_full | Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title_short | Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects |
title_sort | evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class iii and class iv gingival recession defects |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monikak evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects AT sunkalalokesh evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects AT sandeepn evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects AT keerthik evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects AT bharathibvimal evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects AT madhavgajulavenu evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects |