Cargando…

Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultraso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monika, K., Sunkala, Lokesh, Sandeep, N., Keerthi, K., Bharathi, B. Vimal, Madhav, Gajula Venu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19
_version_ 1783541266752995328
author Monika, K.
Sunkala, Lokesh
Sandeep, N.
Keerthi, K.
Bharathi, B. Vimal
Madhav, Gajula Venu
author_facet Monika, K.
Sunkala, Lokesh
Sandeep, N.
Keerthi, K.
Bharathi, B. Vimal
Madhav, Gajula Venu
author_sort Monika, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultrasonic scaling and root planning with hand instruments and curettes. Patient is motivated for home care. The buccal fat pad is harvested and sutured in the gingival recession area and followed up for 6 months and root coverage was calculated. RESULTS: At baseline mean recession of 5.60 ± 1.18 mm, probing depth of 0.73 ± 0.59 mm, clinical attachment loss of 6.40 ± 1.18 mm were recorded. At the end of 6 months, the mean recession was reduced from 5.60 ± 1.18 mm to 2.87 ± 0.74 mm, probing depth was increased from 0.73 ± 0.59 mm to 1.73 ± 0.70 mm and clinical attachment loss was decreased from 6.40 ± 1.18 mm to 4.53 ± 0.83 mm.The difference between baseline score and six months score for all three parameters are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Buccal fat pad is a predictable procedure to cover Miller's class III and class IV gingival recession defects. There was a definitive improvement in clinical parameters (reduction in gingival recession, increased probing depth, gain in clinical attachment) after 6 months. There was 46.78% improvement in root coverage which was statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7266237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72662372020-06-04 Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects Monika, K. Sunkala, Lokesh Sandeep, N. Keerthi, K. Bharathi, B. Vimal Madhav, Gajula Venu J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common clinical feature of periodontal disease and is an undesirable condition. More than 50% of the population has one or more sites with GR ≥ 1 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 15 subjects were subjected to initial periodontal therapy such as ultrasonic scaling and root planning with hand instruments and curettes. Patient is motivated for home care. The buccal fat pad is harvested and sutured in the gingival recession area and followed up for 6 months and root coverage was calculated. RESULTS: At baseline mean recession of 5.60 ± 1.18 mm, probing depth of 0.73 ± 0.59 mm, clinical attachment loss of 6.40 ± 1.18 mm were recorded. At the end of 6 months, the mean recession was reduced from 5.60 ± 1.18 mm to 2.87 ± 0.74 mm, probing depth was increased from 0.73 ± 0.59 mm to 1.73 ± 0.70 mm and clinical attachment loss was decreased from 6.40 ± 1.18 mm to 4.53 ± 0.83 mm.The difference between baseline score and six months score for all three parameters are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Buccal fat pad is a predictable procedure to cover Miller's class III and class IV gingival recession defects. There was a definitive improvement in clinical parameters (reduction in gingival recession, increased probing depth, gain in clinical attachment) after 6 months. There was 46.78% improvement in root coverage which was statistically significant. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7266237/ /pubmed/32509667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Monika, K.
Sunkala, Lokesh
Sandeep, N.
Keerthi, K.
Bharathi, B. Vimal
Madhav, Gajula Venu
Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title_full Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title_fullStr Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title_short Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects
title_sort evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class iii and class iv gingival recession defects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1104_19
work_keys_str_mv AT monikak evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects
AT sunkalalokesh evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects
AT sandeepn evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects
AT keerthik evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects
AT bharathibvimal evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects
AT madhavgajulavenu evaluationofrootcoveragewithpedicledbuccalfatpadinclassiiiandclassivgingivalrecessiondefects