Cargando…
Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey
BACKGROUND: How systematic review authors address missing data among eligible primary studies remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether systematic review authors are consistent in the way they handle missing data, both across trials included in the same meta-analysis, and with their reported m...
Autores principales: | Kahale, Lara A, Khamis, Assem M, Diab, Batoul, Chang, Yaping, Lopes, Luciane Cruz, Agarwal, Arnav, Li, Ling, Mustafa, Reem A, Koujanian, Serge, Waziry, Reem, Busse, Jason W, Dakik, Abeer, Hooft, Lotty, Guyatt, Gordon H, Scholten, Rob J P M, Akl, Elie A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547244 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S242080 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study
por: Kahale, Lara A, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Requirements of Clinical Journals for Authors’ Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest: A Cross Sectional Study
por: Shawwa, Khaled, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey
por: Khamis, Assem M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Interventions for waterpipe tobacco smoking prevention and cessation: a systematic review
por: Jawad, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2016)