Cargando…
Effect of Smoking on Breast Cancer by Adjusting for Smoking Misclassification Bias and Confounders Using a Probabilistic Bias Analysis Method
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the association between smoking and breast cancer after adjusting for smoking misclassification bias and confounders. METHODS: In this case–control study, 1000 women with breast cancer and 1000 healthy controls were selected. Using a probabilistic bias...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547245 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S252025 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the association between smoking and breast cancer after adjusting for smoking misclassification bias and confounders. METHODS: In this case–control study, 1000 women with breast cancer and 1000 healthy controls were selected. Using a probabilistic bias analysis method, the association between smoking and breast cancer was adjusted for the bias resulting from misclassification of smoking secondary to self-reporting as well as a minimally sufficient adjustment set of confounders derived from a causal directed acyclic graph (cDAG). Population attributable fraction (PAF) for smoking was calculated using Miettinen’s formula. RESULTS: While the odds ratio (OR) from the conventional logistic regression model between smoking and breast cancer was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.36–1.13), the adjusted ORs from the probabilistic bias analysis were in the ranges of 2.63–2.69 and 1.73–2.83 for non-differential and differential misclassification, respectively. PAF ranges obtained were 1.36–1.72% and 0.62–2.01% using the non-differential bias analysis and differential bias analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: After misclassification correction for smoking, the non-significant negative-adjusted association between smoking and breast cancer changed to a significant positive-adjusted association. |
---|