Cargando…
Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm
Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z |
_version_ | 1783541358176239616 |
---|---|
author | Kayser, Jürgen Wong, Lidia Y. X. Sacchi, Elizabeth Casal-Roscum, Lindsey Alvarenga, Jorge E. Hugdahl, Kenneth Bruder, Gerard E. Jonides, John |
author_facet | Kayser, Jürgen Wong, Lidia Y. X. Sacchi, Elizabeth Casal-Roscum, Lindsey Alvarenga, Jorge E. Hugdahl, Kenneth Bruder, Gerard E. Jonides, John |
author_sort | Kayser, Jürgen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/not suppressed ear (“valid”) or the ignored/suppressed ear (“lure”), or were not presented (“control”). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test–retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7266708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72667082020-06-11 Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm Kayser, Jürgen Wong, Lidia Y. X. Sacchi, Elizabeth Casal-Roscum, Lindsey Alvarenga, Jorge E. Hugdahl, Kenneth Bruder, Gerard E. Jonides, John Behav Res Methods Article Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/not suppressed ear (“valid”) or the ignored/suppressed ear (“lure”), or were not presented (“control”). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test–retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-12-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7266708/ /pubmed/31797177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Kayser, Jürgen Wong, Lidia Y. X. Sacchi, Elizabeth Casal-Roscum, Lindsey Alvarenga, Jorge E. Hugdahl, Kenneth Bruder, Gerard E. Jonides, John Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title | Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title_full | Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title_fullStr | Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title_short | Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
title_sort | behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayserjurgen behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT wonglidiayx behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT sacchielizabeth behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT casalroscumlindsey behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT alvarengajorgee behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT hugdahlkenneth behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT brudergerarde behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm AT jonidesjohn behavioralmeasuresofattentionandcognitivecontrolduringanewauditoryworkingmemoryparadigm |