Cargando…

A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Effective analgesia is essential for patient recovery after liver resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative intrathecal morphine to multimodal intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niewiński, Grzegorz, Figiel, Wojciech, Grąt, Michał, Dec, Marta, Morawski, Marcin, Patkowski, Waldemar, Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05437-x
_version_ 1783541372475670528
author Niewiński, Grzegorz
Figiel, Wojciech
Grąt, Michał
Dec, Marta
Morawski, Marcin
Patkowski, Waldemar
Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
author_facet Niewiński, Grzegorz
Figiel, Wojciech
Grąt, Michał
Dec, Marta
Morawski, Marcin
Patkowski, Waldemar
Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
author_sort Niewiński, Grzegorz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective analgesia is essential for patient recovery after liver resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative intrathecal morphine to multimodal intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing liver resection were randomly assigned to the patient-controlled analgesia with (ITM-IV) or without (IV) preoperative intrathecal morphine groups. All patients received acetaminophen and dexketoprofen. The primary outcome was pain severity at rest over three postoperative days, assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: The study included 36 patients (18 in each group). The mean maximum daily NRS scores over the first three postoperative days in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 1.3, 1.1, and 0.3 and 1.6, 1.1, and 0.7, respectively (p = 0.580). No differences were observed in pain severity while coughing, with corresponding scores of 2.8, 2.1, and 1.1, respectively, in the ITM-IV group and 2.3, 2.2, and 1.5, respectively, in the IV group (p = 0.963). Proportions of patients reporting clinically significant pain at rest and while coughing were 11.1% and 44.4%, respectively, in the ITM-IV group, and 16.7% and 44.4%, respectively, in the IV group (both p > 0.999). Cumulative morphine doses in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 26 mg and 17 mg, respectively (p = 0.257). Both groups also showed similar time to mobilization (p = 0.791) and solid food intake (p = 0.743), sedation grade (p = 0.584), and morbidity (p = 0.402). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative intrathecal morphine administration provides no benefits to multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT03620916
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7266793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72667932020-06-12 A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Niewiński, Grzegorz Figiel, Wojciech Grąt, Michał Dec, Marta Morawski, Marcin Patkowski, Waldemar Zieniewicz, Krzysztof World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: Effective analgesia is essential for patient recovery after liver resection. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative intrathecal morphine to multimodal intravenous analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing liver resection were randomly assigned to the patient-controlled analgesia with (ITM-IV) or without (IV) preoperative intrathecal morphine groups. All patients received acetaminophen and dexketoprofen. The primary outcome was pain severity at rest over three postoperative days, assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: The study included 36 patients (18 in each group). The mean maximum daily NRS scores over the first three postoperative days in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 1.3, 1.1, and 0.3 and 1.6, 1.1, and 0.7, respectively (p = 0.580). No differences were observed in pain severity while coughing, with corresponding scores of 2.8, 2.1, and 1.1, respectively, in the ITM-IV group and 2.3, 2.2, and 1.5, respectively, in the IV group (p = 0.963). Proportions of patients reporting clinically significant pain at rest and while coughing were 11.1% and 44.4%, respectively, in the ITM-IV group, and 16.7% and 44.4%, respectively, in the IV group (both p > 0.999). Cumulative morphine doses in the ITM-IV and IV groups were 26 mg and 17 mg, respectively (p = 0.257). Both groups also showed similar time to mobilization (p = 0.791) and solid food intake (p = 0.743), sedation grade (p = 0.584), and morbidity (p = 0.402). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative intrathecal morphine administration provides no benefits to multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT03620916 Springer International Publishing 2020-02-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7266793/ /pubmed/32112166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05437-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Niewiński, Grzegorz
Figiel, Wojciech
Grąt, Michał
Dec, Marta
Morawski, Marcin
Patkowski, Waldemar
Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short A Comparison of Intrathecal and Intravenous Morphine for Analgesia After Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of intrathecal and intravenous morphine for analgesia after hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05437-x
work_keys_str_mv AT niewinskigrzegorz acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT figielwojciech acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gratmichał acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT decmarta acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morawskimarcin acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patkowskiwaldemar acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zieniewiczkrzysztof acomparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT niewinskigrzegorz comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT figielwojciech comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gratmichał comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT decmarta comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morawskimarcin comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patkowskiwaldemar comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zieniewiczkrzysztof comparisonofintrathecalandintravenousmorphineforanalgesiaafterhepatectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial