Cargando…

Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased in the last 2 decades and continuous surveillance is needed. This systematic review aims to assess the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [PTB], low birth weight [LBW], small-for-gestationalage [SGA] and large for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elias, Flavia T. S., Weber-Adrian, Danielle, Pudwell, Jessica, Carter, Jillian, Walker, Mark, Gaudet, Laura, Smith, Graeme, Velez, Maria P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05593-4
_version_ 1783541386863181824
author Elias, Flavia T. S.
Weber-Adrian, Danielle
Pudwell, Jessica
Carter, Jillian
Walker, Mark
Gaudet, Laura
Smith, Graeme
Velez, Maria P.
author_facet Elias, Flavia T. S.
Weber-Adrian, Danielle
Pudwell, Jessica
Carter, Jillian
Walker, Mark
Gaudet, Laura
Smith, Graeme
Velez, Maria P.
author_sort Elias, Flavia T. S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased in the last 2 decades and continuous surveillance is needed. This systematic review aims to assess the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [PTB], low birth weight [LBW], small-for-gestationalage [SGA] and large for gestational-age [LGA]), in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to spontaneous conceptions. METHODS: Cohort studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library (January 2019), and manual search. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) using random effects models in RevMan 5.3 and I-squared (I(2)) test > 50% was considered as high heterogeneity. RESULTS: After 3142 titles and abstracts were screened, 1180 full-text articles were assessed, and 14 were eligible. For fresh embryo transfer, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.64 (95% CI 1.46, 1.84); I(2) = 97%; LBW 1.67 (95% CI 1.52, 1.85); I(2) = 94%; SGA 1.46 [95% CI 1.11, 1.92]; I(2) = 99%, LGA 0.88 (95% CI 0.80, 0.87); I(2) = 80%). For frozen, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.39 (95% CI 1.34, 1.44); I(2) = 0%; LBW 1.38 (95% CI 0.91, 2.09); I(2) = 98%; SGA 0.83 (95% CI 0.57, 1.19); I(2) = 0%, LGA 1.57 (95% CI 1.48, 1.68); I(2) = 22%). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with spontaneous pregnancies, fresh, but not frozen was associated with LBW and SGA. Both fresh and frozen were associated with PTB. Frozen was uniquely associated with LGA. Despite improvements in ART protocols in relation to pregnancy rates, attention is needed towards monitoring adverse neonatal outcomes in these pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05593-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7266861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72668612020-06-15 Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Elias, Flavia T. S. Weber-Adrian, Danielle Pudwell, Jessica Carter, Jillian Walker, Mark Gaudet, Laura Smith, Graeme Velez, Maria P. Arch Gynecol Obstet Review PURPOSE: The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased in the last 2 decades and continuous surveillance is needed. This systematic review aims to assess the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [PTB], low birth weight [LBW], small-for-gestationalage [SGA] and large for gestational-age [LGA]), in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared to spontaneous conceptions. METHODS: Cohort studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library (January 2019), and manual search. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) using random effects models in RevMan 5.3 and I-squared (I(2)) test > 50% was considered as high heterogeneity. RESULTS: After 3142 titles and abstracts were screened, 1180 full-text articles were assessed, and 14 were eligible. For fresh embryo transfer, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.64 (95% CI 1.46, 1.84); I(2) = 97%; LBW 1.67 (95% CI 1.52, 1.85); I(2) = 94%; SGA 1.46 [95% CI 1.11, 1.92]; I(2) = 99%, LGA 0.88 (95% CI 0.80, 0.87); I(2) = 80%). For frozen, the pooled ORs were PTB 1.39 (95% CI 1.34, 1.44); I(2) = 0%; LBW 1.38 (95% CI 0.91, 2.09); I(2) = 98%; SGA 0.83 (95% CI 0.57, 1.19); I(2) = 0%, LGA 1.57 (95% CI 1.48, 1.68); I(2) = 22%). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with spontaneous pregnancies, fresh, but not frozen was associated with LBW and SGA. Both fresh and frozen were associated with PTB. Frozen was uniquely associated with LGA. Despite improvements in ART protocols in relation to pregnancy rates, attention is needed towards monitoring adverse neonatal outcomes in these pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05593-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7266861/ /pubmed/32445067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05593-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Elias, Flavia T. S.
Weber-Adrian, Danielle
Pudwell, Jessica
Carter, Jillian
Walker, Mark
Gaudet, Laura
Smith, Graeme
Velez, Maria P.
Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05593-4
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasflaviats neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weberadriandanielle neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pudwelljessica neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carterjillian neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT walkermark neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaudetlaura neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smithgraeme neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT velezmariap neonataloutcomesinsingletonpregnanciesconceivedbyfreshorfrozenembryotransfercomparedtospontaneousconceptionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis