Cargando…
Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Almost 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) as a result of fulminant colitis, dysplasia, cancer, or medical refractory diseases. Around 50% will experience pouchitis, an idiopathic inflammatory condition invo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04330-1 |
_version_ | 1783541447545323520 |
---|---|
author | Trang-Poisson, Caroline Kerdreux, Elise Poinas, Alexandra Planche, Lucie Sokol, Harry Bemer, Pascale Cabanas, Karine Hivernaud, Eliane Biron, Laetitia Flet, Laurent Montassier, Emmanuel Le Garcasson, Ghislaine Chiffoleau, Anne Jobert, Alexandra Lepelletier, Didier Caillon, Jocelyne Le Pape, Patrice Imbert, Berthe-Marie Bourreille, Arnaud |
author_facet | Trang-Poisson, Caroline Kerdreux, Elise Poinas, Alexandra Planche, Lucie Sokol, Harry Bemer, Pascale Cabanas, Karine Hivernaud, Eliane Biron, Laetitia Flet, Laurent Montassier, Emmanuel Le Garcasson, Ghislaine Chiffoleau, Anne Jobert, Alexandra Lepelletier, Didier Caillon, Jocelyne Le Pape, Patrice Imbert, Berthe-Marie Bourreille, Arnaud |
author_sort | Trang-Poisson, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Almost 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) as a result of fulminant colitis, dysplasia, cancer, or medical refractory diseases. Around 50% will experience pouchitis, an idiopathic inflammatory condition involving the ileal reservoir, responsible for digestive symptoms, deterioration in quality of life, and disability. Though the majority of initial cases of pouchitis are easily managed with a short course of antibiotics, in about 10% of cases, inflammation of the pouch becomes chronic with very few treatments available. Previous studies have suggested that manipulating the composition of intestinal flora through antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics achieved significant results for treating acute episodes of UC-associated pouchitis. However, there is currently no established effective treatment for chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel therapy involving the transfer of normal intestinal flora from a healthy donor to a patient with a medical condition potentially caused by the disrupted homeostasis of intestinal microbiota or dysbiosis. METHODS: Our project aims to compare the delay of relapse of chronic recurrent pouchitis after FMT versus sham transplantation. Forty-two patients with active recurrent pouchitis after having undergone an IPAA for UC will be enrolled at 12 French centers. The patients who respond to antibiotherapy will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either FMT or sham transplantation. DISCUSSION: On April 30, 2014, the World Health Organization published an alarming report on antibiotic resistance. Finding an alternative medical treatment to antibiotics in order to prevent relapses of pouchitis is therefore becoming increasingly important given the risk posed by multiresistant bacteria. Moreover, if the results of this study are conclusive, FMT, which is less expensive than biologics, could become a routine treatment in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524352. Registered on 14 May 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7267479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72674792020-06-03 Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial Trang-Poisson, Caroline Kerdreux, Elise Poinas, Alexandra Planche, Lucie Sokol, Harry Bemer, Pascale Cabanas, Karine Hivernaud, Eliane Biron, Laetitia Flet, Laurent Montassier, Emmanuel Le Garcasson, Ghislaine Chiffoleau, Anne Jobert, Alexandra Lepelletier, Didier Caillon, Jocelyne Le Pape, Patrice Imbert, Berthe-Marie Bourreille, Arnaud Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Almost 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) as a result of fulminant colitis, dysplasia, cancer, or medical refractory diseases. Around 50% will experience pouchitis, an idiopathic inflammatory condition involving the ileal reservoir, responsible for digestive symptoms, deterioration in quality of life, and disability. Though the majority of initial cases of pouchitis are easily managed with a short course of antibiotics, in about 10% of cases, inflammation of the pouch becomes chronic with very few treatments available. Previous studies have suggested that manipulating the composition of intestinal flora through antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics achieved significant results for treating acute episodes of UC-associated pouchitis. However, there is currently no established effective treatment for chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel therapy involving the transfer of normal intestinal flora from a healthy donor to a patient with a medical condition potentially caused by the disrupted homeostasis of intestinal microbiota or dysbiosis. METHODS: Our project aims to compare the delay of relapse of chronic recurrent pouchitis after FMT versus sham transplantation. Forty-two patients with active recurrent pouchitis after having undergone an IPAA for UC will be enrolled at 12 French centers. The patients who respond to antibiotherapy will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either FMT or sham transplantation. DISCUSSION: On April 30, 2014, the World Health Organization published an alarming report on antibiotic resistance. Finding an alternative medical treatment to antibiotics in order to prevent relapses of pouchitis is therefore becoming increasingly important given the risk posed by multiresistant bacteria. Moreover, if the results of this study are conclusive, FMT, which is less expensive than biologics, could become a routine treatment in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524352. Registered on 14 May 2018. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7267479/ /pubmed/32493442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04330-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Trang-Poisson, Caroline Kerdreux, Elise Poinas, Alexandra Planche, Lucie Sokol, Harry Bemer, Pascale Cabanas, Karine Hivernaud, Eliane Biron, Laetitia Flet, Laurent Montassier, Emmanuel Le Garcasson, Ghislaine Chiffoleau, Anne Jobert, Alexandra Lepelletier, Didier Caillon, Jocelyne Le Pape, Patrice Imbert, Berthe-Marie Bourreille, Arnaud Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title | Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on chronic recurrent pouchitis in ulcerative colitis with ileo-anal anastomosis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04330-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trangpoissoncaroline impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kerdreuxelise impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poinasalexandra impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT planchelucie impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sokolharry impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bemerpascale impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cabanaskarine impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hivernaudeliane impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bironlaetitia impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fletlaurent impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT montassieremmanuel impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT legarcassonghislaine impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chiffoleauanne impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jobertalexandra impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lepelletierdidier impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caillonjocelyne impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lepapepatrice impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT imbertberthemarie impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bourreillearnaud impactoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationonchronicrecurrentpouchitisinulcerativecolitiswithileoanalanastomosisstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial |