Cargando…

Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19

There are currently no proven or approved treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Early anecdotal reports and limited in vitro data led to the significant uptake of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and to lesser extent chloroquine (CQ), for many patients with this disease. As an increasing numb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyerowitz, Eric A., Vannier, Augustin G. L., Friesen, Morgan G. N., Schoenfeld, Sara, Gelfand, Jeffrey A., Callahan, Michael V., Kim, Arthur Y., Reeves, Patrick M., Poznansky, Mark C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000919
_version_ 1783541452350947328
author Meyerowitz, Eric A.
Vannier, Augustin G. L.
Friesen, Morgan G. N.
Schoenfeld, Sara
Gelfand, Jeffrey A.
Callahan, Michael V.
Kim, Arthur Y.
Reeves, Patrick M.
Poznansky, Mark C.
author_facet Meyerowitz, Eric A.
Vannier, Augustin G. L.
Friesen, Morgan G. N.
Schoenfeld, Sara
Gelfand, Jeffrey A.
Callahan, Michael V.
Kim, Arthur Y.
Reeves, Patrick M.
Poznansky, Mark C.
author_sort Meyerowitz, Eric A.
collection PubMed
description There are currently no proven or approved treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Early anecdotal reports and limited in vitro data led to the significant uptake of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and to lesser extent chloroquine (CQ), for many patients with this disease. As an increasing number of patients with COVID‐19 are treated with these agents and more evidence accumulates, there continues to be no high‐quality clinical data showing a clear benefit of these agents for this disease. Moreover, these agents have the potential to cause harm, including a broad range of adverse events including serious cardiac side effects when combined with other agents. In addition, the known and potent immunomodulatory effects of these agents which support their use in the treatment of auto‐immune conditions, and provided a component in the original rationale for their use in patients with COVID‐19, may, in fact, undermine their utility in the context of the treatment of this respiratory viral infection. Specifically, the impact of HCQ on cytokine production and suppression of antigen presentation may have immunologic consequences that hamper innate and adaptive antiviral immune responses for patients with COVID‐19. Similarly, the reported in vitro inhibition of viral proliferation is largely derived from the blockade of viral fusion that initiates infection rather than the direct inhibition of viral replication as seen with nucleoside/tide analogs in other viral infections. Given these facts and the growing uncertainty about these agents for the treatment of COVID‐19, it is clear that at the very least thoughtful planning and data collection from randomized clinical trials are needed to understand what if any role these agents may have in this disease. In this article, we review the datasets that support or detract from the use of these agents for the treatment of COVID‐19 and render a data informed opinion that they should only be used with caution and in the context of carefully thought out clinical trials, or on a case‐by‐case basis after rigorous consideration of the risks and benefits of this therapeutic approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7267640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72676402020-06-03 Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19 Meyerowitz, Eric A. Vannier, Augustin G. L. Friesen, Morgan G. N. Schoenfeld, Sara Gelfand, Jeffrey A. Callahan, Michael V. Kim, Arthur Y. Reeves, Patrick M. Poznansky, Mark C. FASEB J Reviews There are currently no proven or approved treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Early anecdotal reports and limited in vitro data led to the significant uptake of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and to lesser extent chloroquine (CQ), for many patients with this disease. As an increasing number of patients with COVID‐19 are treated with these agents and more evidence accumulates, there continues to be no high‐quality clinical data showing a clear benefit of these agents for this disease. Moreover, these agents have the potential to cause harm, including a broad range of adverse events including serious cardiac side effects when combined with other agents. In addition, the known and potent immunomodulatory effects of these agents which support their use in the treatment of auto‐immune conditions, and provided a component in the original rationale for their use in patients with COVID‐19, may, in fact, undermine their utility in the context of the treatment of this respiratory viral infection. Specifically, the impact of HCQ on cytokine production and suppression of antigen presentation may have immunologic consequences that hamper innate and adaptive antiviral immune responses for patients with COVID‐19. Similarly, the reported in vitro inhibition of viral proliferation is largely derived from the blockade of viral fusion that initiates infection rather than the direct inhibition of viral replication as seen with nucleoside/tide analogs in other viral infections. Given these facts and the growing uncertainty about these agents for the treatment of COVID‐19, it is clear that at the very least thoughtful planning and data collection from randomized clinical trials are needed to understand what if any role these agents may have in this disease. In this article, we review the datasets that support or detract from the use of these agents for the treatment of COVID‐19 and render a data informed opinion that they should only be used with caution and in the context of carefully thought out clinical trials, or on a case‐by‐case basis after rigorous consideration of the risks and benefits of this therapeutic approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-29 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7267640/ /pubmed/32350928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000919 Text en © 2020 The Authors. The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Meyerowitz, Eric A.
Vannier, Augustin G. L.
Friesen, Morgan G. N.
Schoenfeld, Sara
Gelfand, Jeffrey A.
Callahan, Michael V.
Kim, Arthur Y.
Reeves, Patrick M.
Poznansky, Mark C.
Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title_full Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title_fullStr Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title_short Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
title_sort rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of covid‐19
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000919
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerowitzerica rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT vannieraugustingl rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT friesenmorgangn rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT schoenfeldsara rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT gelfandjeffreya rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT callahanmichaelv rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT kimarthury rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT reevespatrickm rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19
AT poznanskymarkc rethinkingtheroleofhydroxychloroquineinthetreatmentofcovid19