Cargando…
Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity
The moment‐to‐moment focus of our mind's eye results from a complex interplay of voluntary and involuntary influences on attention. Previous neuroimaging studies suggest that the brain networks of voluntary versus involuntary attention can be segregated into a frontal‐versus‐parietal or a dorsa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24850 |
_version_ | 1783541503599050752 |
---|---|
author | Bowling, Jake T. Friston, Karl J. Hopfinger, Joseph B. |
author_facet | Bowling, Jake T. Friston, Karl J. Hopfinger, Joseph B. |
author_sort | Bowling, Jake T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The moment‐to‐moment focus of our mind's eye results from a complex interplay of voluntary and involuntary influences on attention. Previous neuroimaging studies suggest that the brain networks of voluntary versus involuntary attention can be segregated into a frontal‐versus‐parietal or a dorsal‐versus‐ventral partition—although recent work suggests that the dorsal network may be involved in both bottom‐up and top‐down attention. Research with nonhuman primates has provided evidence that a key distinction between top‐down and bottom‐up attention may be the direction of connectivity between frontal and parietal areas. Whereas typical fMRI connectivity analyses cannot disambiguate the direction of connections, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) can model directionality. Using DCM, we provide new evidence that directed connections within the dorsal attention network are differentially modulated for voluntary versus involuntary attention. These results suggest that the intraparietal sulcus exerts a baseline inhibitory effect on the frontal eye fields that is strengthened during exogenous orienting and attenuated during endogenous orienting. Furthermore, the attenuation from endogenous attention occurs even with salient peripheral cues when those cues are known to be counter predictive. Thus, directed connectivity between frontal and parietal regions of the dorsal attention network is highly influenced by the type of attention that is engaged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7267915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72679152020-06-12 Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity Bowling, Jake T. Friston, Karl J. Hopfinger, Joseph B. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles The moment‐to‐moment focus of our mind's eye results from a complex interplay of voluntary and involuntary influences on attention. Previous neuroimaging studies suggest that the brain networks of voluntary versus involuntary attention can be segregated into a frontal‐versus‐parietal or a dorsal‐versus‐ventral partition—although recent work suggests that the dorsal network may be involved in both bottom‐up and top‐down attention. Research with nonhuman primates has provided evidence that a key distinction between top‐down and bottom‐up attention may be the direction of connectivity between frontal and parietal areas. Whereas typical fMRI connectivity analyses cannot disambiguate the direction of connections, dynamic causal modeling (DCM) can model directionality. Using DCM, we provide new evidence that directed connections within the dorsal attention network are differentially modulated for voluntary versus involuntary attention. These results suggest that the intraparietal sulcus exerts a baseline inhibitory effect on the frontal eye fields that is strengthened during exogenous orienting and attenuated during endogenous orienting. Furthermore, the attenuation from endogenous attention occurs even with salient peripheral cues when those cues are known to be counter predictive. Thus, directed connectivity between frontal and parietal regions of the dorsal attention network is highly influenced by the type of attention that is engaged. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7267915/ /pubmed/31692192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24850 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Bowling, Jake T. Friston, Karl J. Hopfinger, Joseph B. Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title | Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title_full | Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title_fullStr | Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title_short | Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
title_sort | top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal–parietal connectivity |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowlingjaket topdownversusbottomupattentiondifferentiallymodulatefrontalparietalconnectivity AT fristonkarlj topdownversusbottomupattentiondifferentiallymodulatefrontalparietalconnectivity AT hopfingerjosephb topdownversusbottomupattentiondifferentiallymodulatefrontalparietalconnectivity |