Cargando…
Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901 |
_version_ | 1783541510111756288 |
---|---|
author | Jamil, Asif Batsikadze, Giorgi Kuo, Hsiao‐I. Meesen, Raf L. J. Dechent, Peter Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. |
author_facet | Jamil, Asif Batsikadze, Giorgi Kuo, Hsiao‐I. Meesen, Raf L. J. Dechent, Peter Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. |
author_sort | Jamil, Asif |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative studies between stimulation‐induced changes in cortical excitability obtained from TMS, and cortical neurovascular activity obtained from fMRI, prevent the extrapolation of respective physiological and mechanistic bases. We investigated polarity‐ and intensity‐dependent effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using resting‐state arterial spin labeling (ASL‐MRI), and compared the respective changes to TMS‐induced cortical excitability (amplitudes of motor evoked potentials, MEP) in separate sessions within the same subjects (n = 29). Fifteen minutes of sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0‐mA anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) in a randomized repeated‐measure design. Time‐course changes were measured before, during and intermittently up to 120‐min after stimulation. ROI analyses indicated linear intensity‐ and polarity‐dependent tDCS after‐effects: all anodal‐M1 intensities increased CBF under the M1 electrode, with 2.0‐mA increasing CBF the greatest (15.3%) compared to sham, while all cathodal‐M1 intensities decreased left M1 CBF from baseline, with 2.0‐mA decreasing the greatest (−9.3%) from sham after 120‐min. The spatial distribution of perfusion changes correlated with the predicted electric field, as simulated with finite element modeling. Moreover, tDCS‐induced excitability changes correlated more strongly with perfusion changes in the left sensorimotor region compared to the targeted hand‐knob region. Our findings reveal lasting tDCS‐induced alterations in cerebral perfusion, which are dose‐dependent with tDCS parameters, but only partially account for excitability changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7267945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72679452020-06-12 Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study Jamil, Asif Batsikadze, Giorgi Kuo, Hsiao‐I. Meesen, Raf L. J. Dechent, Peter Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative studies between stimulation‐induced changes in cortical excitability obtained from TMS, and cortical neurovascular activity obtained from fMRI, prevent the extrapolation of respective physiological and mechanistic bases. We investigated polarity‐ and intensity‐dependent effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using resting‐state arterial spin labeling (ASL‐MRI), and compared the respective changes to TMS‐induced cortical excitability (amplitudes of motor evoked potentials, MEP) in separate sessions within the same subjects (n = 29). Fifteen minutes of sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0‐mA anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) in a randomized repeated‐measure design. Time‐course changes were measured before, during and intermittently up to 120‐min after stimulation. ROI analyses indicated linear intensity‐ and polarity‐dependent tDCS after‐effects: all anodal‐M1 intensities increased CBF under the M1 electrode, with 2.0‐mA increasing CBF the greatest (15.3%) compared to sham, while all cathodal‐M1 intensities decreased left M1 CBF from baseline, with 2.0‐mA decreasing the greatest (−9.3%) from sham after 120‐min. The spatial distribution of perfusion changes correlated with the predicted electric field, as simulated with finite element modeling. Moreover, tDCS‐induced excitability changes correlated more strongly with perfusion changes in the left sensorimotor region compared to the targeted hand‐knob region. Our findings reveal lasting tDCS‐induced alterations in cerebral perfusion, which are dose‐dependent with tDCS parameters, but only partially account for excitability changes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7267945/ /pubmed/31860160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Jamil, Asif Batsikadze, Giorgi Kuo, Hsiao‐I. Meesen, Raf L. J. Dechent, Peter Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title | Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title_full | Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title_fullStr | Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title_full_unstemmed | Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title_short | Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study |
title_sort | current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: an fmri study |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamilasif currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT batsikadzegiorgi currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT kuohsiaoi currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT meesenraflj currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT dechentpeter currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT pauluswalter currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy AT nitschemichaela currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy |