Cargando…

Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamil, Asif, Batsikadze, Giorgi, Kuo, Hsiao‐I., Meesen, Raf L. J., Dechent, Peter, Paulus, Walter, Nitsche, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901
_version_ 1783541510111756288
author Jamil, Asif
Batsikadze, Giorgi
Kuo, Hsiao‐I.
Meesen, Raf L. J.
Dechent, Peter
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
author_facet Jamil, Asif
Batsikadze, Giorgi
Kuo, Hsiao‐I.
Meesen, Raf L. J.
Dechent, Peter
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
author_sort Jamil, Asif
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative studies between stimulation‐induced changes in cortical excitability obtained from TMS, and cortical neurovascular activity obtained from fMRI, prevent the extrapolation of respective physiological and mechanistic bases. We investigated polarity‐ and intensity‐dependent effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using resting‐state arterial spin labeling (ASL‐MRI), and compared the respective changes to TMS‐induced cortical excitability (amplitudes of motor evoked potentials, MEP) in separate sessions within the same subjects (n = 29). Fifteen minutes of sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0‐mA anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) in a randomized repeated‐measure design. Time‐course changes were measured before, during and intermittently up to 120‐min after stimulation. ROI analyses indicated linear intensity‐ and polarity‐dependent tDCS after‐effects: all anodal‐M1 intensities increased CBF under the M1 electrode, with 2.0‐mA increasing CBF the greatest (15.3%) compared to sham, while all cathodal‐M1 intensities decreased left M1 CBF from baseline, with 2.0‐mA decreasing the greatest (−9.3%) from sham after 120‐min. The spatial distribution of perfusion changes correlated with the predicted electric field, as simulated with finite element modeling. Moreover, tDCS‐induced excitability changes correlated more strongly with perfusion changes in the left sensorimotor region compared to the targeted hand‐knob region. Our findings reveal lasting tDCS‐induced alterations in cerebral perfusion, which are dose‐dependent with tDCS parameters, but only partially account for excitability changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7267945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72679452020-06-12 Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study Jamil, Asif Batsikadze, Giorgi Kuo, Hsiao‐I. Meesen, Raf L. J. Dechent, Peter Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative studies between stimulation‐induced changes in cortical excitability obtained from TMS, and cortical neurovascular activity obtained from fMRI, prevent the extrapolation of respective physiological and mechanistic bases. We investigated polarity‐ and intensity‐dependent effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using resting‐state arterial spin labeling (ASL‐MRI), and compared the respective changes to TMS‐induced cortical excitability (amplitudes of motor evoked potentials, MEP) in separate sessions within the same subjects (n = 29). Fifteen minutes of sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0‐mA anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) in a randomized repeated‐measure design. Time‐course changes were measured before, during and intermittently up to 120‐min after stimulation. ROI analyses indicated linear intensity‐ and polarity‐dependent tDCS after‐effects: all anodal‐M1 intensities increased CBF under the M1 electrode, with 2.0‐mA increasing CBF the greatest (15.3%) compared to sham, while all cathodal‐M1 intensities decreased left M1 CBF from baseline, with 2.0‐mA decreasing the greatest (−9.3%) from sham after 120‐min. The spatial distribution of perfusion changes correlated with the predicted electric field, as simulated with finite element modeling. Moreover, tDCS‐induced excitability changes correlated more strongly with perfusion changes in the left sensorimotor region compared to the targeted hand‐knob region. Our findings reveal lasting tDCS‐induced alterations in cerebral perfusion, which are dose‐dependent with tDCS parameters, but only partially account for excitability changes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7267945/ /pubmed/31860160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jamil, Asif
Batsikadze, Giorgi
Kuo, Hsiao‐I.
Meesen, Raf L. J.
Dechent, Peter
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title_full Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title_fullStr Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title_full_unstemmed Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title_short Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study
title_sort current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: an fmri study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901
work_keys_str_mv AT jamilasif currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT batsikadzegiorgi currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT kuohsiaoi currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT meesenraflj currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT dechentpeter currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT pauluswalter currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy
AT nitschemichaela currentintensityandpolarityspecificonlineandaftereffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanfmristudy