Cargando…

Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project

Resting‐state analyses evaluating large‐scale brain networks have largely focused on static correlations in brain activity over extended time periods, however emerging approaches capture time‐varying or dynamic patterns of transient functional networks. In light of these new approaches, there is a n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janes, Amy C., Peechatka, Alyssa L., Frederick, Blaise B., Kaiser, Roselinde H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31639271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24808
_version_ 1783541534023483392
author Janes, Amy C.
Peechatka, Alyssa L.
Frederick, Blaise B.
Kaiser, Roselinde H.
author_facet Janes, Amy C.
Peechatka, Alyssa L.
Frederick, Blaise B.
Kaiser, Roselinde H.
author_sort Janes, Amy C.
collection PubMed
description Resting‐state analyses evaluating large‐scale brain networks have largely focused on static correlations in brain activity over extended time periods, however emerging approaches capture time‐varying or dynamic patterns of transient functional networks. In light of these new approaches, there is a need to classify common transient network states (TNS) in terms of their spatial and dynamic properties. To fill this gap, two independent resting state scans collected in 462 healthy adults from the Human Connectome Project were evaluated using coactivation pattern analysis to identify (eight) TNS that recurred across participants and over time. These TNS spatially overlapped with prototypical resting state networks, but also diverged in notable ways. In particular, analyses revealed three TNS that shared cortical midline overlap with the default mode network (DMN), but these “complex” DMN states also encompassed distinct regions that fall beyond the prototypical DMN, suggesting that the DMN defined using static methods may represent the average of distinct complex‐DMN states. Of note, dwell time was higher in “complex” DMN states, challenging the idea that the prototypical DMN, as a single unit, is the dominant resting‐state network as typically defined by static resting state methods. In comparing the two resting state scans, we also found high reliability in the spatial organization and dynamic activities of network states involving DMN or sensorimotor regions. Future work will determine whether these TNS defined by coactivation patterns are in other samples, and are linked to fundamental cognitive properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7268046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72680462020-06-12 Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project Janes, Amy C. Peechatka, Alyssa L. Frederick, Blaise B. Kaiser, Roselinde H. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Resting‐state analyses evaluating large‐scale brain networks have largely focused on static correlations in brain activity over extended time periods, however emerging approaches capture time‐varying or dynamic patterns of transient functional networks. In light of these new approaches, there is a need to classify common transient network states (TNS) in terms of their spatial and dynamic properties. To fill this gap, two independent resting state scans collected in 462 healthy adults from the Human Connectome Project were evaluated using coactivation pattern analysis to identify (eight) TNS that recurred across participants and over time. These TNS spatially overlapped with prototypical resting state networks, but also diverged in notable ways. In particular, analyses revealed three TNS that shared cortical midline overlap with the default mode network (DMN), but these “complex” DMN states also encompassed distinct regions that fall beyond the prototypical DMN, suggesting that the DMN defined using static methods may represent the average of distinct complex‐DMN states. Of note, dwell time was higher in “complex” DMN states, challenging the idea that the prototypical DMN, as a single unit, is the dominant resting‐state network as typically defined by static resting state methods. In comparing the two resting state scans, we also found high reliability in the spatial organization and dynamic activities of network states involving DMN or sensorimotor regions. Future work will determine whether these TNS defined by coactivation patterns are in other samples, and are linked to fundamental cognitive properties. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7268046/ /pubmed/31639271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24808 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Janes, Amy C.
Peechatka, Alyssa L.
Frederick, Blaise B.
Kaiser, Roselinde H.
Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title_full Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title_fullStr Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title_short Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project
title_sort dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the human connectome project
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31639271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24808
work_keys_str_mv AT janesamyc dynamicfunctioningoftransientrestingstatecoactivationnetworksinthehumanconnectomeproject
AT peechatkaalyssal dynamicfunctioningoftransientrestingstatecoactivationnetworksinthehumanconnectomeproject
AT frederickblaiseb dynamicfunctioningoftransientrestingstatecoactivationnetworksinthehumanconnectomeproject
AT kaiserroselindeh dynamicfunctioningoftransientrestingstatecoactivationnetworksinthehumanconnectomeproject