Cargando…

A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, despite being largely preventable and treatable. Improving overall screening rates among both men and women is considered an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity and mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valery, Jose Raul, Applewhite, Andres, Manaois, Alyssa, Dimuna, John, Sher, Taimur, Heckman, Michael G., Brushaber, Danielle E., Stancampiano, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720931321
_version_ 1783541545011511296
author Valery, Jose Raul
Applewhite, Andres
Manaois, Alyssa
Dimuna, John
Sher, Taimur
Heckman, Michael G.
Brushaber, Danielle E.
Stancampiano, Fernando
author_facet Valery, Jose Raul
Applewhite, Andres
Manaois, Alyssa
Dimuna, John
Sher, Taimur
Heckman, Michael G.
Brushaber, Danielle E.
Stancampiano, Fernando
author_sort Valery, Jose Raul
collection PubMed
description Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, despite being largely preventable and treatable. Improving overall screening rates among both men and women is considered an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity and mortality from CRC. In order to optimize screening strategies, factors associated with decreased compliance need to be understood. This study aimed to compare initial CRC screening rates between males and females in a population of patients who presented for an annual physical examination. Methods: A retrospective chart review study of 380 patients designed to compare rates of initial CRC screening between males and females was conducted. Patients who were seen at our institution for an annual physical examination and were between 51 and 60 years of age were included. Results: There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of initial colon cancer screening between females (83.0%) and males (80.9%) in either unadjusted analysis (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .59) or in multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounding variables (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .61). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the rate of initial CRC screening between males and females who presented for an annual physical examination. This suggests that designing interventions to improve screening specific to gender may not be needed in a population of patients who attend routine preventive health examinations. Further study is needed in the general population to examine for gender-based differences in initial CRC screening among patients who do not regularly follow up for preventive examinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7268106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72681062020-06-11 A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations Valery, Jose Raul Applewhite, Andres Manaois, Alyssa Dimuna, John Sher, Taimur Heckman, Michael G. Brushaber, Danielle E. Stancampiano, Fernando J Prim Care Community Health Original Research Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, despite being largely preventable and treatable. Improving overall screening rates among both men and women is considered an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity and mortality from CRC. In order to optimize screening strategies, factors associated with decreased compliance need to be understood. This study aimed to compare initial CRC screening rates between males and females in a population of patients who presented for an annual physical examination. Methods: A retrospective chart review study of 380 patients designed to compare rates of initial CRC screening between males and females was conducted. Patients who were seen at our institution for an annual physical examination and were between 51 and 60 years of age were included. Results: There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of initial colon cancer screening between females (83.0%) and males (80.9%) in either unadjusted analysis (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .59) or in multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounding variables (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .61). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the rate of initial CRC screening between males and females who presented for an annual physical examination. This suggests that designing interventions to improve screening specific to gender may not be needed in a population of patients who attend routine preventive health examinations. Further study is needed in the general population to examine for gender-based differences in initial CRC screening among patients who do not regularly follow up for preventive examinations. SAGE Publications 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7268106/ /pubmed/32484009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720931321 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Valery, Jose Raul
Applewhite, Andres
Manaois, Alyssa
Dimuna, John
Sher, Taimur
Heckman, Michael G.
Brushaber, Danielle E.
Stancampiano, Fernando
A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title_full A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title_fullStr A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title_short A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Initial Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations
title_sort retrospective analysis of gender-based difference in adherence to initial colon cancer screening recommendations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720931321
work_keys_str_mv AT valeryjoseraul aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT applewhiteandres aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT manaoisalyssa aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT dimunajohn aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT shertaimur aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT heckmanmichaelg aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT brushaberdaniellee aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT stancampianofernando aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT valeryjoseraul retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT applewhiteandres retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT manaoisalyssa retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT dimunajohn retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT shertaimur retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT heckmanmichaelg retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT brushaberdaniellee retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations
AT stancampianofernando retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinitialcoloncancerscreeningrecommendations