Cargando…
YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTube™ (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32487232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08731-4 |
_version_ | 1783541572606885888 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Jiangqing Zhang, Shengcen Xiao, Qirong Cao, Yingping Li, Bin |
author_facet | Huang, Jiangqing Zhang, Shengcen Xiao, Qirong Cao, Yingping Li, Bin |
author_sort | Huang, Jiangqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTube™ (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos regarding Candida auris infection, and to identify whether it is a useful resource for people. METHODS: The YouTube™ was used to search systematically for videos using the keywords: “Candida auris infection” and “Candida auris”. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the videos. The videos were reviewed and scored by two independent reviewers and recorded the “title”, “length”, “views”, “comments”, “dislike”, “like”, “posted days” and “category of videos”. The videos were categorized as “poor”, “good” and “excellent” by the score. The DISCERN tool was used to assess the reliability of the YouTube™ videos. RESULTS: Seventy-six videos were included in final analysis in our study. Most videos (59.2%, 55/76) had better quality. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect of the number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, percentage positivity, likebility, view rate and viewers’ interaction. Length and posted days were significantly associated with the classification. The videos were categorized as “educational video”, “new report”, “personal experience and blog entertainment” and “interview”. Significant differences were found in the source of videos and the characteristics of the individuals appearing in a video between the groups. CONCLUSION: YouTube™ has striking potential to be an effective user-friendly learning interface for people to obtain information of Candida auris infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7268238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72682382020-06-07 YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review Huang, Jiangqing Zhang, Shengcen Xiao, Qirong Cao, Yingping Li, Bin BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Candida auris is a novel Candida species, and has emerged globally as a multidrug-resistant health care-associated fungal pathogen. YouTube™ (http://www.youtube.com) as the largest free video-sharing website is increasingly used to search health information. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube™ videos regarding Candida auris infection, and to identify whether it is a useful resource for people. METHODS: The YouTube™ was used to search systematically for videos using the keywords: “Candida auris infection” and “Candida auris”. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the videos. The videos were reviewed and scored by two independent reviewers and recorded the “title”, “length”, “views”, “comments”, “dislike”, “like”, “posted days” and “category of videos”. The videos were categorized as “poor”, “good” and “excellent” by the score. The DISCERN tool was used to assess the reliability of the YouTube™ videos. RESULTS: Seventy-six videos were included in final analysis in our study. Most videos (59.2%, 55/76) had better quality. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect of the number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, percentage positivity, likebility, view rate and viewers’ interaction. Length and posted days were significantly associated with the classification. The videos were categorized as “educational video”, “new report”, “personal experience and blog entertainment” and “interview”. Significant differences were found in the source of videos and the characteristics of the individuals appearing in a video between the groups. CONCLUSION: YouTube™ has striking potential to be an effective user-friendly learning interface for people to obtain information of Candida auris infection. BioMed Central 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7268238/ /pubmed/32487232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08731-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Jiangqing Zhang, Shengcen Xiao, Qirong Cao, Yingping Li, Bin YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title | YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title_full | YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title_short | YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review |
title_sort | youtube™ as a source of information for candida auris infection: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32487232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08731-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjiangqing youtubeasasourceofinformationforcandidaaurisinfectionasystematicreview AT zhangshengcen youtubeasasourceofinformationforcandidaaurisinfectionasystematicreview AT xiaoqirong youtubeasasourceofinformationforcandidaaurisinfectionasystematicreview AT caoyingping youtubeasasourceofinformationforcandidaaurisinfectionasystematicreview AT libin youtubeasasourceofinformationforcandidaaurisinfectionasystematicreview |