Cargando…

Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial

BACKGROUND: The application of bedside ultrasound to evaluate gastric content and volume can assist in determining aspiration risk. Applying positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices (SAD) can result in a degree of gastric insufflation. This study assessed and compared the antral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Qiuping, Wu, Di, Fang, Weiping, Wong, Gordon Tin Chun, Lu, Yao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01057-z
_version_ 1783541631566217216
author Ye, Qiuping
Wu, Di
Fang, Weiping
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lu, Yao
author_facet Ye, Qiuping
Wu, Di
Fang, Weiping
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lu, Yao
author_sort Ye, Qiuping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The application of bedside ultrasound to evaluate gastric content and volume can assist in determining aspiration risk. Applying positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices (SAD) can result in a degree of gastric insufflation. This study assessed and compared the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery when managed with different SAD. METHODS: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II female patients were assessed for inclusion in this study and divided into three groups of different ventilation devices. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups to receive LMA-Supreme (Group S), I-gel (Group I) or tracheal tube (Group T). The primary outcome was the antral cross-sectional area and secondary outcomes included haemodynamic parameters and postoperative morbidity such as sore throat, hoarseness, dry throat, nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: The antral CSA was not significantly different among three groups before induction (P = 0.451), after induction (P = 0.456) and at the end of surgery (P = 0.195). The haemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the tracheal tube group than in the LMA-Supreme and I-gel groups after insertion (P < 0.0001) and after removal (P < 0.01). Sore throat was detected in none in the I-gel group compare to two patients (6.7%) in the LMA-Supreme group and fifteen patients (50%) in the tracheal tube group. Hoareness was detected in one (3.3%) in the I-gel group compare to two patients (6.7%) in the LMA-Supreme group and eleven patients (36.7%) in the tracheal tube group. CONCLUSIONS: The SADs do not cause obvious gastric insufflation. Thus, LMA-Supreme and I-gel can be widely used as alternative to endotracheal intubation for the short laparoscopic gynecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800018212, data of registration, September 2018).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7268504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72685042020-06-07 Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial Ye, Qiuping Wu, Di Fang, Weiping Wong, Gordon Tin Chun Lu, Yao BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The application of bedside ultrasound to evaluate gastric content and volume can assist in determining aspiration risk. Applying positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices (SAD) can result in a degree of gastric insufflation. This study assessed and compared the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery when managed with different SAD. METHODS: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II female patients were assessed for inclusion in this study and divided into three groups of different ventilation devices. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups to receive LMA-Supreme (Group S), I-gel (Group I) or tracheal tube (Group T). The primary outcome was the antral cross-sectional area and secondary outcomes included haemodynamic parameters and postoperative morbidity such as sore throat, hoarseness, dry throat, nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: The antral CSA was not significantly different among three groups before induction (P = 0.451), after induction (P = 0.456) and at the end of surgery (P = 0.195). The haemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the tracheal tube group than in the LMA-Supreme and I-gel groups after insertion (P < 0.0001) and after removal (P < 0.01). Sore throat was detected in none in the I-gel group compare to two patients (6.7%) in the LMA-Supreme group and fifteen patients (50%) in the tracheal tube group. Hoareness was detected in one (3.3%) in the I-gel group compare to two patients (6.7%) in the LMA-Supreme group and eleven patients (36.7%) in the tracheal tube group. CONCLUSIONS: The SADs do not cause obvious gastric insufflation. Thus, LMA-Supreme and I-gel can be widely used as alternative to endotracheal intubation for the short laparoscopic gynecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800018212, data of registration, September 2018). BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7268504/ /pubmed/32493213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01057-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ye, Qiuping
Wu, Di
Fang, Weiping
Wong, Gordon Tin Chun
Lu, Yao
Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title_full Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title_fullStr Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title_short Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
title_sort comparison of gastric insufflation using lma-supreme and i-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01057-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yeqiuping comparisonofgastricinsufflationusinglmasupremeandigelversustrachealintubationinlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgerybyultrasoundarandomizedobservationaltrial
AT wudi comparisonofgastricinsufflationusinglmasupremeandigelversustrachealintubationinlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgerybyultrasoundarandomizedobservationaltrial
AT fangweiping comparisonofgastricinsufflationusinglmasupremeandigelversustrachealintubationinlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgerybyultrasoundarandomizedobservationaltrial
AT wonggordontinchun comparisonofgastricinsufflationusinglmasupremeandigelversustrachealintubationinlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgerybyultrasoundarandomizedobservationaltrial
AT luyao comparisonofgastricinsufflationusinglmasupremeandigelversustrachealintubationinlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgerybyultrasoundarandomizedobservationaltrial