Cargando…
Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ
BACKGROUND: Invasion is often found during postoperative pathological examination of cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by histological examinations such as core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). A meta-analysis reported that 25.9% of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07001-1 |
_version_ | 1783541633773469696 |
---|---|
author | Takada, Koji Kashiwagi, Shinichiro Asano, Yuka Goto, Wataru Morisaki, Tamami Takahashi, Katsuyuki Fujita, Hisakazu Takashima, Tsutomu Tomita, Shuhei Hirakawa, Kosei Ohira, Masaichi |
author_facet | Takada, Koji Kashiwagi, Shinichiro Asano, Yuka Goto, Wataru Morisaki, Tamami Takahashi, Katsuyuki Fujita, Hisakazu Takashima, Tsutomu Tomita, Shuhei Hirakawa, Kosei Ohira, Masaichi |
author_sort | Takada, Koji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Invasion is often found during postoperative pathological examination of cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by histological examinations such as core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). A meta-analysis reported that 25.9% of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cases are preoperatively diagnosed by CNB as DCIS. Risk factors for invasion have been studied by postoperative examination, but no factors have been found that could be obtained preoperatively from blood tests. In this study, we investigated factors predictive of invasion based on preoperative blood tests in patients diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy. METHODS: In this study, 118 patients who were diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy were included. Biopsies were performed with 16-gauge CNB or VAB. Peripheral blood was obtained at the time of diagnosis. This study evaluated absolute platelet count, absolute lymphocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cancer antigen 15–3 (CA15–3). The platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was calculated by dividing the absolute platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count, and patients were grouped into high PLR (≥160.0) and low PLR (< 160.0) groups. RESULTS: Invasion was found more frequently after surgery in pathologically high-grade cases than in pathologically not-high-grade cases (p = 0.015). The median PLR was 138.9 and 48 patients (40.7%) were classified into the high PLR group. The high PLR group was significantly more likely to have invasion detected by the postoperative pathology than the low PLR group (p = 0.018). In multivariate analysis of factors predictive of invasion in postoperative pathology, a high PLR (p = 0.006, odds ratio [OR] = 3.526) and biopsy method (VAB vs. CNB, p = 0.001, OR = 0.201) was an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The PLR may be a predictor of invasion in the postoperative pathology for patients diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7268513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72685132020-06-07 Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ Takada, Koji Kashiwagi, Shinichiro Asano, Yuka Goto, Wataru Morisaki, Tamami Takahashi, Katsuyuki Fujita, Hisakazu Takashima, Tsutomu Tomita, Shuhei Hirakawa, Kosei Ohira, Masaichi BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Invasion is often found during postoperative pathological examination of cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by histological examinations such as core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). A meta-analysis reported that 25.9% of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cases are preoperatively diagnosed by CNB as DCIS. Risk factors for invasion have been studied by postoperative examination, but no factors have been found that could be obtained preoperatively from blood tests. In this study, we investigated factors predictive of invasion based on preoperative blood tests in patients diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy. METHODS: In this study, 118 patients who were diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy were included. Biopsies were performed with 16-gauge CNB or VAB. Peripheral blood was obtained at the time of diagnosis. This study evaluated absolute platelet count, absolute lymphocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cancer antigen 15–3 (CA15–3). The platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was calculated by dividing the absolute platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count, and patients were grouped into high PLR (≥160.0) and low PLR (< 160.0) groups. RESULTS: Invasion was found more frequently after surgery in pathologically high-grade cases than in pathologically not-high-grade cases (p = 0.015). The median PLR was 138.9 and 48 patients (40.7%) were classified into the high PLR group. The high PLR group was significantly more likely to have invasion detected by the postoperative pathology than the low PLR group (p = 0.018). In multivariate analysis of factors predictive of invasion in postoperative pathology, a high PLR (p = 0.006, odds ratio [OR] = 3.526) and biopsy method (VAB vs. CNB, p = 0.001, OR = 0.201) was an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The PLR may be a predictor of invasion in the postoperative pathology for patients diagnosed with DCIS by preoperative biopsy. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7268513/ /pubmed/32493410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07001-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Takada, Koji Kashiwagi, Shinichiro Asano, Yuka Goto, Wataru Morisaki, Tamami Takahashi, Katsuyuki Fujita, Hisakazu Takashima, Tsutomu Tomita, Shuhei Hirakawa, Kosei Ohira, Masaichi Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title | Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full | Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_fullStr | Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_short | Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_sort | factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07001-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takadakoji factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT kashiwagishinichiro factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT asanoyuka factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT gotowataru factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT morisakitamami factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT takahashikatsuyuki factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT fujitahisakazu factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT takashimatsutomu factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT tomitashuhei factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT hirakawakosei factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu AT ohiramasaichi factorspredictiveofinvasiveductalcarcinomaincasespreoperativelydiagnosedasductalcarcinomainsitu |