Cargando…
Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity
BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilms adhere to all tissues and surfaces in the oral cavity. Oral biofilms are responsible for the decay of human dental structures and the inflammatory degeneration of the alveolar bone. Moreover, oral biofilms on artificial materials influence the lifespan of dental prosth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01147-x |
_version_ | 1783541670367723520 |
---|---|
author | Engel, Alexander-Simon Kranz, Hagen Tizian Schneider, Marvin Tietze, Jan Peter Piwowarcyk, Andree Kuzius, Thorsten Arnold, Wolfgang Naumova, Ella A. |
author_facet | Engel, Alexander-Simon Kranz, Hagen Tizian Schneider, Marvin Tietze, Jan Peter Piwowarcyk, Andree Kuzius, Thorsten Arnold, Wolfgang Naumova, Ella A. |
author_sort | Engel, Alexander-Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilms adhere to all tissues and surfaces in the oral cavity. Oral biofilms are responsible for the decay of human dental structures and the inflammatory degeneration of the alveolar bone. Moreover, oral biofilms on artificial materials influence the lifespan of dental prostheses and restoratives. METHODS: To investigate in vivo oral biofilm formation and growth, five different dental restorative materials were analyzed and compared to human enamel. The roughness of the materials and the human enamel control probe were measured at the start of the study. The dental restorative materials and the human enamel control probe were placed in dental splints and worn for 3 h, 24 h and 72 h. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed major differences between oral biofilm formation and growth on the materials compared to those on human enamel. Microbiological analyses showed that bacterial strains differed between the materials. Significant differences were observed in the roughness of the dental materials. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that material roughness affects biofilm formation on dental surfaces and restoratives, but other factors, such as surface charge, surface energy and material composition, may also have an influence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7268681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72686812020-06-08 Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity Engel, Alexander-Simon Kranz, Hagen Tizian Schneider, Marvin Tietze, Jan Peter Piwowarcyk, Andree Kuzius, Thorsten Arnold, Wolfgang Naumova, Ella A. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilms adhere to all tissues and surfaces in the oral cavity. Oral biofilms are responsible for the decay of human dental structures and the inflammatory degeneration of the alveolar bone. Moreover, oral biofilms on artificial materials influence the lifespan of dental prostheses and restoratives. METHODS: To investigate in vivo oral biofilm formation and growth, five different dental restorative materials were analyzed and compared to human enamel. The roughness of the materials and the human enamel control probe were measured at the start of the study. The dental restorative materials and the human enamel control probe were placed in dental splints and worn for 3 h, 24 h and 72 h. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed major differences between oral biofilm formation and growth on the materials compared to those on human enamel. Microbiological analyses showed that bacterial strains differed between the materials. Significant differences were observed in the roughness of the dental materials. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that material roughness affects biofilm formation on dental surfaces and restoratives, but other factors, such as surface charge, surface energy and material composition, may also have an influence. BioMed Central 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7268681/ /pubmed/32493365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01147-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Engel, Alexander-Simon Kranz, Hagen Tizian Schneider, Marvin Tietze, Jan Peter Piwowarcyk, Andree Kuzius, Thorsten Arnold, Wolfgang Naumova, Ella A. Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title | Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title_full | Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title_fullStr | Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title_full_unstemmed | Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title_short | Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
title_sort | biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01147-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelalexandersimon biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT kranzhagentizian biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT schneidermarvin biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT tietzejanpeter biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT piwowarcykandree biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT kuziusthorsten biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT arnoldwolfgang biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity AT naumovaellaa biofilmformationondifferentdentalrestorativematerialsintheoralcavity |